Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Explore gamma function fitting as alternative to gaussian fitting #85

Closed
voytek opened this issue Apr 27, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Explore gamma function fitting as alternative to gaussian fitting #85

voytek opened this issue Apr 27, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@voytek
Copy link
Contributor

voytek commented Apr 27, 2018

There are some cases where there's a peak with a long right tail that fooof will fit 2-3 gaussians to, when this may not match human intuition for what's happening.

Granted we do not currently know what the ground truth is in these situations, but it's worth exploring how fitting a gamma function, rather than a gaussian, might achieve similar overall fit performance with fewer parameters, matching more how human raters seem to fit.
@TomDonoghue TomDonoghue added the v2 label May 23, 2018
@TomDonoghue TomDonoghue mentioned this issue Dec 10, 2019
Closed
@TomDonoghue
Copy link
Member

Following #154, this has been moved to:
fooof-tools/Development#4

@TomDonoghue TomDonoghue removed the v2 label Dec 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@voytek @TomDonoghue