Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignoring & Selecting Different Frequency Ranges #8

Open
TomDonoghue opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Ignoring & Selecting Different Frequency Ranges #8

TomDonoghue opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@TomDonoghue
Copy link
Member

There has been some discussion of either adding exclusion zones to model fitting, and/or fitting different frequency ranges for aperiodic & periodic fitting. This is something that could be broadly interesting, and useful, but I think it needs a bit more looking to figure if and how to best adopt it.

Things to keep in mind:

  • If there are 'gaps' in the fit spectrum, we have to consider if and how to fit peaks that might be next to, or overlap with, these regions.
    • Related: we have procedures for dealing with peaks near edges, that might need to be extended
  • The logic of the model recommends that to fit either periodic or aperiodic requires dealing with / fitting the other component. Though I think there could be reason and utility to fit different ranges / exclude regions, I don't think we want to lean too far into fitting these as separate processes.

Related prior discussions:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant