You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There has been some discussion of either adding exclusion zones to model fitting, and/or fitting different frequency ranges for aperiodic & periodic fitting. This is something that could be broadly interesting, and useful, but I think it needs a bit more looking to figure if and how to best adopt it.
Things to keep in mind:
If there are 'gaps' in the fit spectrum, we have to consider if and how to fit peaks that might be next to, or overlap with, these regions.
Related: we have procedures for dealing with peaks near edges, that might need to be extended
The logic of the model recommends that to fit either periodic or aperiodic requires dealing with / fitting the other component. Though I think there could be reason and utility to fit different ranges / exclude regions, I don't think we want to lean too far into fitting these as separate processes.
Related prior discussions:
Exclude a frequency regions for fitting
This discussion led to adding the interpolate_spectrum function
There has been some discussion of either adding exclusion zones to model fitting, and/or fitting different frequency ranges for aperiodic & periodic fitting. This is something that could be broadly interesting, and useful, but I think it needs a bit more looking to figure if and how to best adopt it.
Things to keep in mind:
Related prior discussions:
interpolate_spectrum
functionThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: