Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion is very close to the purpose of #223, so I will temporarily close this discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently, paths.Store has two implementations: paths.Remote and paths.Local. These implementations are tightly coupled in several areas, making it challenging to extend storage options.
I suggest that we abstract LocalStore and RemoteStore into interfaces to achieve better decoupling. This approach could improve the flexibility of our storage system and make it easier to introduce new storage implementations.
look forward to discussing how we can implement this change and exploring the potential benefits and challenges it may bring.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions