We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From an ImageJ mailing list thread:
Doing some stitching of a "large" dataset I encountered a « bug ». Stitching parameters Issue : Weird pixel attribution DATASET : Channel : 1 Each Z-stack: 2048x2048x92 (around 750Mb / stack) Total Positions : 112 (16x7) Eachtiled-slice is around 700Mb,(total around 85 Go) Downscaled dataset Channel : 1 Each Z stack: 512x512x23 (around 11Mb / stack) Total Positions : 112 (16x7) Each tiled-slice is around 30Mb, (total around 1.25 Go) Computer : CPU IntelXeonx64, 16 Cores, 2.6Ghz,RAM 128Gb GPU : Quadro6000 If the stitching of the original dataset is done with computing the overlap. We observed a weird pixel attribution. a bug ? If the stitching of the original dataset is done without computing the overlap. We don’t observed anymore the bug. Using a downscaled version of the data set, we don’t observed a bug if the stitching is done with or without computing overlap
Doing some stitching of a "large" dataset I encountered a « bug ».
Stitching parameters
If the stitching of the original dataset is done with computing the overlap. We observed a weird pixel attribution. a bug ?
If the stitching of the original dataset is done without computing the overlap. We don’t observed anymore the bug.
Using a downscaled version of the data set, we don’t observed a bug if the stitching is done with or without computing overlap
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
From an ImageJ mailing list thread:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: