-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve consistency of forward and inverse modeling documentation #571
Comments
|
https://github.com/fieldtrip/website/tree/master/_data/tag I can see that there is "source", "sourceanalysis" and "sourcemodel"; "inverse"; "forward"; "headmodel". Are all needed? E.g., "forward" is used only once, "source" and "sourceanalysis" sound the same. |
the figures: |
agreed that https://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tag/sourceanalysis/ should be merged with https://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tag/source/ |
I would equate |
… e.g. in forward modeling, see #571
As discussed with @mcpiastra.
The different pages should better use the same terminology, the same (or similar) figures to explain concepts, and link to each other through tags and explicit links in the "see also" sections.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: