You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your amazing work !
I have been working on drone target view geo-localization using Sample4Geo and noticed they are using ConvNeXt backbone for their approach.
I used the ConvNeXt-V2 for same approach using the rest of the training codebase without any modification and trained with my own dataset which is similar with University-1652 dataset, but after training I realized that the result with ConvNeXt-V2 is much mess than ConvNeXt even though the pre-trained model of ConvNeXt-V2 shows the better performance. And also in speed side, ConvNeXt much better than ConvNeXt-V2.
What's wrong with this ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your amazing work !
I have been working on drone target view geo-localization using Sample4Geo and noticed they are using ConvNeXt backbone for their approach.
I used the ConvNeXt-V2 for same approach using the rest of the training codebase without any modification and trained with my own dataset which is similar with University-1652 dataset, but after training I realized that the result with ConvNeXt-V2 is much mess than ConvNeXt even though the pre-trained model of ConvNeXt-V2 shows the better performance. And also in speed side, ConvNeXt much better than ConvNeXt-V2.
What's wrong with this ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: