Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic Tariffs includes time-dependent tarrifs, clarification of documentation #563

Open
gijs007 opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@gijs007
Copy link

gijs007 commented May 9, 2024

The "dynamic tariffs" term is a bit confusing, as this wording can be associated with dynamic energy prices (e.g. from Tiber or other energy providers). Instead of time-fixed energy prices, which are still commonly used.

Furthermore, the dynamic tariffs page does not include time-depended charging in the initial description of this feature:
"If you have an electricity tariff with flexible electricity prices like Tibber or Awattar , you can optimize your network charging with evcc."

Only at the bottom of the page the description mentions: "If a time-dependent or dynamic electricity tariff is configured, the planning algorithm automatically selects the cheapest hours for charging."
Users who don't take the time to read the whole page, might think that the Time-dependent pricing is not used to optimize the charging (and instead is only used to calculate the pricing).

On a side note: The Charge Planner page also refers to the term Dynamic Tariffs, but doesn't mention that Time-dependent charging is included here.

@naltatis
Copy link
Member

naltatis commented May 9, 2024

@gijs007 thanks for this feedback. Are you talking about https://docs.evcc.io/en/docs/devices/tariffs or the still untranslated Feature pages https://docs.evcc.io/en/docs/features/plans and https://docs.evcc.io/en/docs/features/dynamic-prices ?

@gijs007
Copy link
Author

gijs007 commented May 9, 2024

I'm referring to the untranslated feature pages, I used Google Translate for this. I assume the German text is in essence the same ;)

@naltatis
Copy link
Member

naltatis commented May 9, 2024

Ok, thanks for the clarification.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants