Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consensus-layer Call 143 #1158

Open
ralexstokes opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

Consensus-layer Call 143 #1158

ralexstokes opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member

ralexstokes commented Sep 19, 2024

Consensus-layer Call 143

prev: call 142

Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 2024/10/3 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration: 1.5 hours
stream

  1. Electra
  2. PeerDAS / Blob scaling
  3. Research, spec, etc.
  4. Open discussion/Closing remarks
@lucassaldanha
Copy link
Contributor

Anything missing on ethereum/consensus-specs#3918 ?

@lucassaldanha
Copy link
Contributor

And this one ethereum/consensus-specs#3818 :)

@dapplion
Copy link
Contributor

dapplion commented Oct 3, 2024

I want to surface that engine_getBlobsV1 spec PR has been merged

I won't be able to attend but would like to know the impl status of other clients and remind everyone of its importance in light of recent solo stakers orphaned proposal concerns.

@potuz
Copy link

potuz commented Oct 3, 2024

I would continue discussion regarding the engine API and how the CL needs to pass/receive requests as a sidecar.

@hwwhww
Copy link
Collaborator

hwwhww commented Oct 3, 2024

Want to check if we can merge these PRs for the next Pectra devnet release:

These are the current release targets: ethereum/consensus-specs#3954

@chfast
Copy link
Member

chfast commented Oct 3, 2024

Do BLS precompiles gas costs belong here?

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member Author

Anything missing on ethereum/consensus-specs#3918 ?

I think we are ready to merge! will sync on call :)

3818 needs to be updated following changes in 3918

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member Author

Do BLS precompiles gas costs belong here?

if we have time we can touch on these, but it seems more appropriate for ACDE

@chfast
Copy link
Member

chfast commented Oct 3, 2024

Do BLS precompiles gas costs belong here?

if we have time we can touch on these, but it seems more appropriate for ACDE

Better for me too. But I will publish something about it soon.

@akashkshirsagar31
Copy link

Podcast (audio only) - https://open.spotify.com/episode/0EJeVkmCv61vrfG98T6itl?si=9b2af77fc3104e1c

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants