Provide an interop value-prop in more plain terms #1112
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the "Interoperability explainer" document to enhance the understanding of interoperability within the OP Stack. Key additions include a new section on predeploys, expanded explanations of secure message passing, low latency, and the permissionless dependency set. The document now also addresses considerations for chain operators regarding infrastructure requirements and updates the FAQs section with new questions related to interoperability. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)
Line range hint
1-200: Maintain consistent capitalization of technical termsPlease review and update the following instances:
- "Superchain interop" vs "Superchain Interop" - maintain consistency
- "OP Stack" vs "op-supervisor" - consider standardizing capitalization
- "L1" and "L2" should be consistently capitalized throughout
Also, consider tightening up these phrases for clarity:
- "...that fire events to be consumed by..." could be "...that emit events for..."
- "...builds on top of..." could be "...extends..."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (2)
Line range hint 23-200: LGTM! Technical content is accurate and well-structured
The technical explanations, especially the predeploys section, are clear and provide valuable information for developers. The content maintains a good balance between technical depth and accessibility.
Line range hint 1-200: Successfully achieves PR objectives
The document effectively presents the interoperability value proposition in clear terms while maintaining technical accuracy. The additions help readers understand both practical benefits and technical implementation details.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (3)
23-23: Add hyphen in compound modifier "OP-governed"For clarity and proper grammar, compound modifiers should be hyphenated when they precede a noun.
-In a practical sense, this allows users to securely and easily move ETH and tokens from one OP Stack chain to another by leveraging OP governed blockspace security. +In a practical sense, this allows users to securely and easily move ETH and tokens from one OP Stack chain to another by leveraging OP-governed blockspace security.
Line range hint
47-49: Enhance the predeploy introduction for clarityConsider expanding the introduction to better explain what predeploys are and their significance in the context of interoperability.
-The following predeploys have been added to enable interoperability. Predeployed smart contracts exist at predetermined addresses in the genesis state. They are similar to precompiles but instead run directly in the EVM instead of running native code outside the EVM. +The following predeploys have been added to enable interoperability. Predeploys are smart contracts that are automatically deployed at specific addresses when a chain is created (genesis state). Unlike precompiles that execute native code outside the EVM, predeploys run as normal smart contracts within the EVM, making them more flexible and easier to upgrade while maintaining the same deterministic addresses across all OP Stack chains.
Line range hint
124-125: Maintain consistent formatting for technical termsTechnical terms should be formatted consistently using code blocks for better readability.
-If a sequencer does not want to trust another sequencer at all, they can choose to only accept executing messages where the initiating message has been finalized with L1 levels of security. +If a sequencer does not want to trust another sequencer at all, they can choose to only accept `executing messages` where the `initiating message` has been finalized with L1 levels of security.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
I was reading through this doc and we don't do a good job at explaining "why should I care about interop". We explain it at a low level, but we're missing a central thesis. I tried to add one, but it might need some work