Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring of "easypress.ca" #16

Open
acataluddi opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Refactoring of "easypress.ca" #16

acataluddi opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@acataluddi
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @Boreal,
I'd like to improve the Eqpress API. For for what is my understanding, currently the /var/www/easypress.ca contains the deployment API.
To make the code and platform more undertandable, I suggest and would like to refactor the easypress.ca in something like eqpress-api.

Is my assumptions correct and do you agree with the refactoring?

Thanks
Adriano

@graphiclunarkid
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @acataluddi - welcome, and thanks for your interest in our project!

I'd be interested to hear some more details about the refactoring you want to do. Is it just to remove references to the "easypress" name (which was the old name for EQPress before we started working on it at eQualit.ie), or do you have something more in mind? If you can explain a bit further we can figure out how best to support your efforts.

@RamJett and @kheops2713 are the people at equalit.ie who look after EQPress currently. They should be able to help with any technical questions.

@graphiclunarkid
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @acataluddi - welcome, and thanks for your interest in our project!

Oops, I mean "welcome back." Sorry! 😉

@acataluddi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello Richard,
for now I'm just analyzing the platform and I find confusing that a deployment code could be located in a path like /var/www/easypress.ca also because it can be easily confused with a deployed website (and removed by mistake).
Honestly I currently don't have a new architecture design to suggest, just little improvements like this.

Thanks
Adriano

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants