-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Be more forgiving of non-standard crystal frames #4
Comments
As of commit af954e8 the tolerance used for comparing SCALE matrix values has been relaxed to 0.001. Thanks to that 27 structures (plus the recent one 4q8d) that had this problem are now accepted. After this we still have a few PDBs failing the SCALE matrix comparison:
This is the full list:
|
Shouldn't it be possible to run EPPIC on entries which do have a SCALE matrix? Just apply the matrix to the coordinates during loading. |
This was referenced Nov 22, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Yes, non standard crystal frames should be fixed at the PDB level. However, they exist and include the important 4hhb case, so it would be really nice if owl were tolerant of them. Can't we just apply the scale matrix and still get eppic predictions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: