Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Treat WithWarnings via dedicated @Specialization #10650

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

JaroslavTulach
Copy link
Member

@JaroslavTulach JaroslavTulach commented Jul 24, 2024

Pull Request Description

Fixes #10613 by tightening the @Specialization guard.

Checklist

Please ensure that the following checklist has been satisfied before submitting the PR:

  • All code follows the
    Java,
  • Unit tests have been written where possible.

@JaroslavTulach JaroslavTulach added the CI: No changelog needed Do not require a changelog entry for this PR. label Jul 24, 2024
@JaroslavTulach JaroslavTulach self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@JaroslavTulach JaroslavTulach merged commit c6da3a9 into develop Jul 24, 2024
42 checks passed
@JaroslavTulach JaroslavTulach deleted the wip/jtulach/WithoutType10613 branch July 24, 2024 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI: No changelog needed Do not require a changelog entry for this PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adding return type to signature causes Don't use interop for EnsoObject error
5 participants