Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LightningTalks: Format and organize video titles on vimeo for consistency #39

Open
jpailthorpe opened this issue May 23, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jpailthorpe
Copy link

jpailthorpe commented May 23, 2017

though titles have been shortened to meet length limits #56 , they still are widely uneven in terms of formatting and framing.

I just added all BCM videos into a vimeo channel with branding and correct link. However, I noticed that the video titles vary widely in terms of format, sometimes mentioning titles, sometimes mentioning people, sometimes framing each with "Case study lightning talk".

To a complete outside audience, most of these titles don't make much sense. I think we can better title these to include enough context to encourage viewing, and at the same time, make a consistent title format.

https://vimeo.com/channels/bostoncivicmedia

@kanarinka
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed - I suggest assigning the task of revising titles to Sean or Becky

@jpailthorpe
Copy link
Author

Assigning to sean and sean. If you update these titles + descriptions directly in vimeo, you don't need to do anything with the site as they pull automatically.

@jpailthorpe jpailthorpe changed the title Vimeo-LightningTalks: Format and organize video titles for consistency Vimeo-LightningTalks: Format and organize video titles on vimeo for consistency May 23, 2017
@jpailthorpe jpailthorpe changed the title Vimeo-LightningTalks: Format and organize video titles on vimeo for consistency LightningTalks: Format and organize video titles on vimeo for consistency Jun 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants