Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The CONTRIBUTING.md file for electorama/abif needs is not an MVP #16

Open
robla opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

The CONTRIBUTING.md file for electorama/abif needs is not an MVP #16

robla opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@robla
Copy link
Contributor

robla commented Aug 19, 2021

As stated in the subject: the "CONTRIBUTING.md" file for electorama/abif is still kind of a disaster (as of 2021-08-19). A minimum viable product (MVP) for that file would make it so that @robla feels more comfortable accepting pull requests.

@simberaj
Copy link

I am pretty clueless about the choice of an exact license, but I think we don't need copyleft (so a permissive license is OK) and we need some stealth patenting provision.

@robla
Copy link
Contributor Author

robla commented Aug 29, 2021

@simberaj - consider yourself lucky that you're "clueless" about choice of license; my years of experience have only made me more aware of the complicated tradeoffs 😄. For purposes of the specification and the test suite, I'm inclined to use something like the Apache License. It seems as though a copyleft license (such as AGPL 3.0 or CC-by-sa 4.0) could hinder adoption, but choosing something too permissive might cause our small ABIF community to splinter into several subcommunities. More to think about...

@simberaj
Copy link

I think Apache License is not a bad choice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants