Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce #[derive(Setters, Getters)] to derive simple accessor methods #147

Open
Veetaha opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
design needed The feature requires more design effort feature request A new feature is requested

Comments

@Veetaha
Copy link
Contributor

Veetaha commented Sep 21, 2024

This is based on feature requests #24 and #69.

Once we have a feature-complete builder derive we may add a feature to derive the getter/setter methods directly on the structs/enums.

This will effectively be our wheel that reimplements the features from the getset crate and other alternative crates derive_getters, derive_setters.

Note that I'm not yet ready to invest effort into the design of this feature yet. It requires studying the prior art of the getset crate first and then determining how this can be integrated into bon, how this may interact with the builder feature etc. It's a big design effort, that I'd rather postpone to the time when the builder derives/macros are feature complete.

A note for the community from the maintainers

Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to help the maintainers with prioritizing it. You may add a comment describing your real use case related to this issue for us to better understand the problem domain.

@Veetaha Veetaha added design needed The feature requires more design effort feature request A new feature is requested labels Sep 21, 2024
@Veetaha Veetaha changed the title Macro for deriving the accessor methods (setters, getters) Introduce #[derive(Setters, Getters)] to derive simple accessor methods Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
design needed The feature requires more design effort feature request A new feature is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant