Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Cloud Security] Populate Missing Vulnerability Scores in Vulnerabilities Flyout #193656

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 22, 2024

Conversation

CohenIdo
Copy link
Contributor

@CohenIdo CohenIdo commented Sep 22, 2024

Solves:

Summary

Wiz vulnerabilities doesn't contain the score vector field which effects the Findings flyout.
This PR fill it according to the current design with -.

image

@CohenIdo CohenIdo added Team:Cloud Security Cloud Security team related backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) 8.16 candidate release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes and removed 8.16 candidate labels Sep 22, 2024
@CohenIdo CohenIdo marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2024 10:28
@CohenIdo CohenIdo requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2024 10:28
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-cloud-security-posture (Team:Cloud Security)

@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

Async chunks

Total size of all lazy-loaded chunks that will be downloaded as the user navigates the app

id before after diff
cloudSecurityPosture 496.7KB 496.7KB +35.0B

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@CohenIdo CohenIdo merged commit 2a428b4 into elastic:main Sep 22, 2024
20 checks passed
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
8.x

Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI.

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

kibanamachine added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2024
…rabilities Flyout (#193659)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`:
- [[Cloud Security] Populate Missing Vulnerability Scores in
Vulnerabilities Flyout](#193656)

<!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Ido
Cohen","email":"[email protected]"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-09-22T14:31:13Z","message":"[Cloud
Security] Populate Missing Vulnerability Scores in Vulnerabilities
Flyout","sha":"2a428b4e06efa9291b1ac67d86be6a86cd1284b3","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.16.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","v9.0.0","Team:Cloud
Security","backport:prev-minor"],"title":"[Cloud Security] Populate
Missing Vulnerability Scores in Vulnerabilities Flyout
","number":193656,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/193656","mergeCommit":{"message":"[Cloud
Security] Populate Missing Vulnerability Scores in Vulnerabilities
Flyout","sha":"2a428b4e06efa9291b1ac67d86be6a86cd1284b3"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/193656","number":193656,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[Cloud
Security] Populate Missing Vulnerability Scores in Vulnerabilities
Flyout","sha":"2a428b4e06efa9291b1ac67d86be6a86cd1284b3"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Ido Cohen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Cloud Security Cloud Security team related v8.16.0 v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants