-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fleet] Accommodate fetching details about EPM custom integrations #174739
Labels
bug
Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience
Team:Fleet
Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team
Comments
eokoneyo
added
bug
Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience
Team:Fleet
Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team
labels
Jan 12, 2024
Pinging @elastic/fleet (Team:Fleet) |
1 task
eokoneyo
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2024
…4734) ## Summary TLDR; This PR updates the cypress test suite that tests the custom integration used to set up logs during onboarding. The PR #171720 surfaced the fact that this test suite isn't passing, especially given it doesn't run unless a file with the observability onboarding plugin directory is modified. The most notable changes to the test suite, is opting to delete the provided integration without verifying if it is installed. Why would we do this one might ask; - The existing API used to fetch integration packages expects packages to have assets definition, and given this particular one doesn't have assets so the request fails more details [here](#174739). - With the previous approach it required at least one call to determine if the integration should be deleted, the only difference here is when the test kicks off an attempt to delete an integration that doesn't exist will be made once, but that's handled by setting setting the cy.request `failOnStatusCode` option as false, so it doesn't error. - it also unblocks the aforementioned PR <!-- ### Checklist Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR. - [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md) - [ ] [Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials --> - [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios <!-- - [ ] [Flaky Test Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was used on any tests changed - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/)) - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures (run axe in browser: [FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/), [Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US)) - [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker) - [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive layout. (You can test this [in your browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server)) - [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers) ### Risk Matrix Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR. Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature release. When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples and how they may potentially impact the change: | Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes | |---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------| | Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space. | Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between spaces. | | Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low | Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing procedure. | | Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag or plugin combination still results in our service operational. | | [See more potential risk examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) | ### For maintainers - [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process) -->
semd
pushed a commit
to semd/kibana
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2024
…stic#174734) ## Summary TLDR; This PR updates the cypress test suite that tests the custom integration used to set up logs during onboarding. The PR elastic#171720 surfaced the fact that this test suite isn't passing, especially given it doesn't run unless a file with the observability onboarding plugin directory is modified. The most notable changes to the test suite, is opting to delete the provided integration without verifying if it is installed. Why would we do this one might ask; - The existing API used to fetch integration packages expects packages to have assets definition, and given this particular one doesn't have assets so the request fails more details [here](elastic#174739). - With the previous approach it required at least one call to determine if the integration should be deleted, the only difference here is when the test kicks off an attempt to delete an integration that doesn't exist will be made once, but that's handled by setting setting the cy.request `failOnStatusCode` option as false, so it doesn't error. - it also unblocks the aforementioned PR <!-- ### Checklist Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR. - [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md) - [ ] [Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials --> - [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios <!-- - [ ] [Flaky Test Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was used on any tests changed - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/)) - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures (run axe in browser: [FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/), [Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US)) - [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker) - [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive layout. (You can test this [in your browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server)) - [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers) ### Risk Matrix Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR. Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature release. When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples and how they may potentially impact the change: | Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes | |---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------| | Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space. | Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between spaces. | | Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low | Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing procedure. | | Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag or plugin combination still results in our service operational. | | [See more potential risk examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) | ### For maintainers - [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process) -->
@weltenwort Will #174869 fix this issue or is there still more to patch here? |
the fix should be sufficient and has just been merged |
jen-huang
changed the title
Accommodate fetching details about EPM custom integrations
[Fleet] Accommodate fetching details about EPM custom integrations
Jan 29, 2024
Thanks @weltenwort, closing this one then. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
bug
Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience
Team:Fleet
Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team
Kibana version:
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/tree/6c36503a6362435f17e7f2f3bdc0f69974d1e4c5 (this is the latest commit to main at the time of writing this issue, before the PR #174734 gets merged in).
Describe the bug:
Steps to reproduce:
node scripts/build_kibana_platform_plugins --test-plugins --no-cache
to ensure all files required to run the test are builtnode x-pack/plugins/observability_onboarding/scripts/test/e2e --server
to start the ftr server then in a different terminal runnode x-pack/plugins/observability_onboarding/scripts/test/e2e --open
, this will start open the cypress dashboardinstall_elastic_agent.cy.ts
spec.epm/packages/{packageName}
doesn't resolve custom integrations properly. The custom integration created in the first test is found in the saved object, but despite the fact that when inspecting saved objects this particular form of the integration has no assets as seen in value returned;An attempt is still to made to resolve it's assets, which in turn results in the following error on the server;
it's worth pointing out the same happens when the newer endpoint that expects the package version number is used
Expected behavior:
When custom integrations that are installed as packages with no assets are encountered, despite this we should skip trying to process it's non-existent assets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: