We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If you define a working generic type inside a record (being used as a namespace), it throws an assertion error.
## local make_something = generalize(function(T) local MyGeneric = @record{ value: #[T]# } function MyGeneric:get_value() return self.value end ## return MyGeneric ## end) local Something = #[make_something]# local MyNamespace = @record{} local MyNamespace.Something = @Something --- -- local GenericNum = @Something(integer) -- works local GenericNum = @MyNamespace.Something(integer) -- assertion failed local num: GenericNum = { 5 } print(num:get_value())
The same behavior when using the generic directly
Just alias to the generic and use it directly:
local SomethingAlias = @MyNamespace.Something local GenericNum = @SomethingAlias(integer) -- works
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's something I've been aware, it's a limitation for now, will take a look at this eventually.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Bug description
If you define a working generic type inside a record (being used as a namespace), it throws an assertion error.
Code example
Expected behavior
The same behavior when using the generic directly
Workaround
Just alias to the generic and use it directly:
Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: