Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docker: 2.0.19 without libressl? #3134

Open
osgger opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Docker: 2.0.19 without libressl? #3134

osgger opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@osgger
Copy link

osgger commented Oct 9, 2024

Up to 2.0.18 there were two different versions of mosquitto in Docker Hub: One with libressl (tag: eclipse-mosquitto:2.0.18) and one with openssl (tag: eclipse-mosquitto:2.0.18-openssl). This matches the documentation.

In 2.0.19, however, both images seem to be the same (eclipse-mosquitto:2.0.19 and eclipse-mosquitto:2.0.19-openssl). That is strange, since there are still two different Dockerfiles here at GitHub.

Is this correct or a is it a bug? I'm confused ...

Thanks in advance!

@ralight
Copy link
Contributor

ralight commented Oct 9, 2024

The current versions of alpine essentially don't support libressl, so the 2.0.19 and 2.0.19-openssl tags point to the same image.

@osgger
Copy link
Author

osgger commented Oct 10, 2024

Thanks for clarifying this, Roger! Now I found your 2.0.19 bump commit from last week in the Docker library, where you switched the non-openssl tags also into docker/2.0-openssl.

Since this is a semantic change of the Docker image tags, this might be worth some documentation.

Would docker/README.md or docker/2.0/README.md be the right place? The Docker Hub docs don't explain the semantic of the tags at all.

What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants