-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for survival models? #651
Comments
Hi, Can you provide a reproducible example? Model objects from library(easystats)
#> # Attaching packages: easystats 0.4.3
#> v insight 0.15.0.3 v datawizard 0.2.2.9000
#> v bayestestR 0.11.5.1 v performance 0.8.0.1
#> v parameters 0.16.0.1 v effectsize 0.6.0
#> v modelbased 0.7.1 v correlation 0.7.1.1
#> v see 0.7.0.1 v report 0.4.0.1
library(survival)
# Create the simplest test data set
test1 <- list(
time = c(4, 3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3),
status = c(1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0),
x = c(0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0),
sex = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1)
)
# Fit a stratified model
m <- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ x + strata(sex), test1)
parameters(m)
#> Parameter | Coefficient | SE | 95% CI | z | p
#> -------------------------------------------------------------
#> x | 0.80 | 0.82 | [-0.81, 2.41] | 0.98 | 0.329
#>
#> Uncertainty intervals (equal-tailed) and p values (two-tailed) computed using a
#> Wald z-distribution approximation.
performance(m)
#> Warning: Response residuals not available to calculate mean square error. (R)MSE is
#> probably not reliable.
#> Warning: Can't calculate weighted residuals from model.
#> # Indices of model performance
#>
#> AIC | BIC | Nagelkerke's R2 | RMSE | Sigma
#> -----------------------------------------------
#> 8.655 | 8.265 | 0.215 | 0.469 | 0.000
plot(parameters(m)) Created on 2022-01-21 by the reprex package (v2.0.1.9000) |
Oh, sorry I didn't check carefully. However I found some minor problems when using a series of packages from easystat for survival analysis. For example, I wanted to calculate the risk ratio, which should not be shown as Coefficient but HR, which could be an unnecessary error as usual. Also for some hypothesis testing in survival analysis, I tried to run the check_model function in the performance package. However an error popped up. Also, for parameters it does not seem to work for the Kaplan-Meier model. You can see the details in the code below. library(survival)
library(parameters)
library(sjPlot)
#> Install package "strengejacke" from GitHub (`devtools::install_github("strengejacke/strengejacke")`) to load all sj-packages at once!
library(tidyverse)
library(performance)
res.cox <- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ age + sex + wt.loss, data = lung)
#Calculating the risk ratio
res.cox %>% parameters(exponentiate = TRUE)
#> Parameter | Coefficient | SE | 95% CI | z | p
#> -----------------------------------------------------------------
#> age | 1.02 | 9.86e-03 | [1.00, 1.04] | 2.08 | 0.038
#> sex | 0.59 | 0.10 | [0.42, 0.84] | -2.99 | 0.003
#> wt loss | 1.00 | 6.20e-03 | [0.99, 1.01] | 0.12 | 0.902
#>
#> Uncertainty intervals (equal-tailed) and p values (two-tailed) computed using a
#> Wald z-distribution approximation.
#using check_model() from performance
res.cox %>% check_model()
#> Homogeneity of variance could not be computed. Cannot extract residual variance from objects of class 'coxph'.
#> Error in UseMethod("cooks.distance"): no applicable method for 'cooks.distance' applied to an object of class "coxph"
#using parameter in Kaplan-Meier model through survfit()
survfit(Surv(time, status) ~ 1, data = aml) %>% parameters()
#> Error: Sorry, `model_parameters()` failed with the following error (possible class
#> 'survfit' not supported):
#>
#> argument is of length zero |
We do not support |
We could do output similar to summary() method (see here https://www.emilyzabor.com/tutorials/survival_analysis_in_r_tutorial.html) We could choose a set of times using visualization_matrix by default |
Great! I will try it out later.Thank you for your help |
Hi,strengejacke. I really like to use your package for table output and plotting. Your package contains many common models, however, I find that your package does not seem to be able to handle survival models (Survival packages are usually used for survival analysis in the R language). Are there any plans to add this part of the support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: