Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Allow flexible Rusk binary building in workflow #3231

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HDauven
Copy link
Member

@HDauven HDauven commented Dec 19, 2024

Resolves #3230 #3258

@HDauven HDauven force-pushed the 3230/flexible-rusk-binary-build-workflow branch 4 times, most recently from 52d844a to 47070fd Compare December 19, 2024 12:19
@HDauven HDauven marked this pull request as draft December 19, 2024 12:32
@HDauven HDauven force-pushed the 3230/flexible-rusk-binary-build-workflow branch 2 times, most recently from d3f8806 to d5a2f9a Compare December 19, 2024 12:55
@HDauven HDauven force-pushed the 3230/flexible-rusk-binary-build-workflow branch from d5a2f9a to dd385c1 Compare December 19, 2024 13:15
@HDauven HDauven force-pushed the 3230/flexible-rusk-binary-build-workflow branch from dd385c1 to 1339ed3 Compare December 19, 2024 13:19
@HDauven HDauven marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2024 14:33
@HDauven HDauven force-pushed the 3230/flexible-rusk-binary-build-workflow branch from a4ea606 to 431038e Compare December 21, 2024 16:20
- Skip unused features & targets
- Fix Matrix configuration
- Simplify workflow logic

ci: Add prover to Rusk build workflow features
@HDauven HDauven force-pushed the 3230/flexible-rusk-binary-build-workflow branch 4 times, most recently from 1c880d3 to 9940abf Compare December 22, 2024 12:08
@HDauven HDauven force-pushed the 3230/flexible-rusk-binary-build-workflow branch from 9940abf to 0db1c0b Compare December 22, 2024 12:14
Copy link
Member

@Neotamandua Neotamandua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ci: Support Flexible Targets and Features in Rusk Binary Build Workflow
3 participants