Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta: Add RELEASE.md #3224

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

meta: Add RELEASE.md #3224

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

HDauven
Copy link
Member

@HDauven HDauven commented Dec 18, 2024

Resolves #3223

This PR introduces a RELEASE.md outlining a proposed release process for the Rusk monorepo. It covers branching, tagging conventions, a release lifecycle, testing phases and artifact publishing.

@HDauven HDauven requested a review from ZER0 December 18, 2024 14:37
Comment on lines +54 to +55
5. **Day 14:** Community announcement and gradual provisioners upgrade.
6. **Day 16:** Deploy `rusk-vX.Y.Z` to **Mainnet**.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "provisioner upgrade" the same of "deploy to mainnet"?

What's the difference?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "provisioner upgrade" the same of "deploy to mainnet"?

What's the difference?

People already deploying the binary, but thinking about it it doesn't make a whole lot of sense since we'll specify an upgrade is active after a given block height into the future anyway if it's a protocol change. Maybe it makes sense to specify a minimum amount of time/blocks a protocol change needs to be activated.

In terms of the dates mention, they're just examples. Feel free to suggest a different time frame.

1. **Unit Tests:** Every PR must pass.
2. **Integration Tests:** Wallet, SDKs, contracts, circuits.
3. **Network Tests:** Simulate large-scale node clusters.
4. **Compatibility Tests:** Ensure backward compatibility with old node versions.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would change "old node versions" to "previous cluster"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Define a release process in a RELEASE.md
2 participants