Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: provide options for smaller builds #338

Open
bendavis78 opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Feature request: provide options for smaller builds #338

bendavis78 opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@bendavis78
Copy link

bendavis78 commented Dec 5, 2023

The total size of this library was seen as a major downside when evaluating client-side solutions. It would be good if we could decide on different sizes of dictionary checks we want to include, if any at all. For example, SecLists has different options for "top 1M", "top 10k", etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant