You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be very useful to have a calculated field (eval) which automatically compares the category set of the subject and object to determine a violation of the MCS policy (however it may be too complex for an eval and therefore require a new command would be required). In this way, a user could simply alert upon a search such as: eventtype=auditd_events type=AVC category_violation=true
Doing the equivalent for clearance/sensitivity would be a great deal easier I think, but so few people use SELinux as a Trusted System, so it doesn't seem like a priority at this stage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Once this feature is working, the TE dashboard should then filter out information-flow constraint violations (or at least add it as a checkbox option) so only domain/type AVCs are represented; then create a new MLS/MCS dashboard.
It would be very useful to have a calculated field (eval) which automatically compares the category set of the subject and object to determine a violation of the MCS policy (however it may be too complex for an eval and therefore require a new command would be required). In this way, a user could simply alert upon a search such as: eventtype=auditd_events type=AVC category_violation=true
Doing the equivalent for clearance/sensitivity would be a great deal easier I think, but so few people use SELinux as a Trusted System, so it doesn't seem like a priority at this stage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: