You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for an amazing package. I have question, which may, or may not, be related to a possible bug somewhere in source code. (Or it might just be me who lacks the knowledge about about gradient boosting machines!).
I am running the xgb.cv()-function twice, with the exact same specification, but the resulting evaluation_log differs between the two runs, even when using the same folds, parameters and seed. My question is as follows,
Isn't the evaluation_log supposed to be equal if run twice?
Below is reprex to demonstrate the question (or possible bug).
Hi,
Thank you for an amazing package. I have question, which may, or may not, be related to a possible bug somewhere in source code. (Or it might just be me who lacks the knowledge about about gradient boosting machines!).
I am running the
xgb.cv()
-function twice, with the exact same specification, but the resultingevaluation_log
differs between the two runs, even when using the same folds, parameters and seed. My question is as follows,Below is reprex to demonstrate the question (or possible bug).
reprex
Created on 2024-08-22 with reprex v2.1.1
Session info
Best,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: