You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our new websites on github.io and github.com can't seem to agree on what the name of the project is. In the text, titles, and headers, they refer to it variously as "Uby", "UBY", and "DKPro Uby". Which one of these is correct now?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It was said that we used groupIDs and artifactIDs that include "dkpro" and "uby" but that the standalone name "Uby" was so well known already that we wouldn't replace it. In my opinion both "Uby" and "DKPro Uby" would be valid, similar as "UIMA" and "Apache UIMA" refer to the same thing (still most people say "UIMA").
I don't know if "UBY" or "Uby" is more appropriate. But people tend to get capitalization wrong all the time anyway. uimaFIT is constantly referred to as UIMAfit.
Our new websites on github.io and github.com can't seem to agree on what the name of the project is. In the text, titles, and headers, they refer to it variously as "Uby", "UBY", and "DKPro Uby". Which one of these is correct now?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: