[Bug]: BaseSocketClient and DiscordRestClient do not properly implement [Feature] Premium Subscriptions

[Panthr75]

Check The Docs

• I double checked the docs and couldn't find any useful information.

Verify Issue Source

• I verified the issue was caused by Discord.Net.

Check your intents

• I double checked that I have the required intents.

Description

DiscordRestClient and BaseSocketClient were modified to include the interface implementation override for member Task<IEntitlement> IDiscordClient.CreateTestEntitlementAsync(ulong, ulong, SubscriptionOwnerType, RequestOptions?), but not for:

• Task IDiscordClient.DeleteTestEntitlementAsync(ulong, RequestOptions?)
• IAsyncEnumerable<IReadOnlyCollection<IEntitlement>> IDiscordClient.GetEntitlementsAsync(int?, ulong?, ulong?, bool, ulong?, ulong?, ulong[]?, RequestOptions?)
• Task<IReadOnlyCollection<SKU>> IDiscordClient.GetSKUsAsync(RequestOptions?)

This means that when using an object of type IDiscordClient and calling one of those non-overriden members, you will get unexpected behaviour, as it will use the implementation inside BaseDiscordClient which returns null pretty much.

This isn't the first time this has happened: 8baf913

Maybe some automated tooling needs to be put into place so that BaseSocketClient and DiscordRestClient properly override the default BaseDiscordClient implementation, or a reconsideration of how these classes are structured may need to take place.

Version

3.13.0

Working Version

3.12.0

Logs

N/A

Sample

DiscordRestClient restClient = new();
// initialization and loading...

// works fine.
_ = await restClient.GetSKUsAsync();

IDiscordClient interfaceClient = restClient;

// wont work fine, calls `BaseDiscordClient.IDiscordClient.GetSKUsAsync(RequestOptions?)` instead of `DiscordRestClient.GetSKUsAsync(RequestOptions?)`
_ = await interfaceClient.GetSKUsAsync();

Packages

N/A

Environment

N/A

[Panthr75]

Maybe I could make a source analyzer/generator for this?
We could also enforce some style rules as well, so it's a win/win.

[Misha-133]

Maybe I could make a source analyzer/generator for this? We could also enforce some style rules as well, so it's a win/win.

cc @quinchs

[Misha-133]

@Panthr75 there's no need to override these interface members.
In your example

_ = await interfaceClient.GetSKUsAsync();

will actually call the method implementation from DiscordRestClient, not BaseDiscordClient
Same applies to other methods you've mentioned.

You an easily verify it by placing breakpoints in DiscordRestClient.

[Misha-133]

Removing the bug label, but will leave the issue open
A source analyzer for ensuring that all IDiscordClient methods are actually implemented in DiscordRest/SocketClient would be nice IMO.