You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 30, 2024. It is now read-only.
[This the short rewrite of a ticket I wrote that got lost in Github's recent DB issue. Sorry I don't have time to regenerate the stacktrace and paste snippets.]
I make an Rx.amf call to the server and the server sends me a list of records back in AMF format. The AMF is well unmarchalled into a TypedArray but once AMFSercializer tries to get the cached ModelCollection from Rx.models.cache, it gets a null reference back because the neither the TypedArray's itemType property or the defaultType function arguments are set, thus it queries the cache with a null fqn.
Somewhere along the flow, wether on the server side or client side, the itemType property is not set. I think it should be on the server where the object originates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[This the short rewrite of a ticket I wrote that got lost in Github's recent DB issue. Sorry I don't have time to regenerate the stacktrace and paste snippets.]
I make an Rx.amf call to the server and the server sends me a list of records back in AMF format. The AMF is well unmarchalled into a TypedArray but once AMFSercializer tries to get the cached ModelCollection from Rx.models.cache, it gets a null reference back because the neither the TypedArray's itemType property or the defaultType function arguments are set, thus it queries the cache with a null fqn.
Somewhere along the flow, wether on the server side or client side, the itemType property is not set. I think it should be on the server where the object originates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: