Warning: This spec has not yet stabilized. If you are interested in writing a verifier for this spec you should stay appraised for changes to the spec.
The .mmb
file format is a binary format for compactly expressing proofs that can be verified by checkers like mm0-c
. The details of this format will eventually become part of the formal proof of correctness of a verifier based on mm0-c
. This verifier reads an .mm0
file (using the MM0 file format) and a companion .mmb
file, and checks that the proofs in the .mmb
file are correct and align with the .mm0
theorem statements.
All numbers are expressed in little endian fixed width types. Some tables require 4 or 8 byte alignment, but the proof stream is 1 byte aligned.
u8
: a 1 byte unsigned integeru16
: a 2 byte unsigned integeru32
: a 4 byte unsigned integeru64
: an 8 byte unsigned integeru1
: a bit, used in bit packing descriptionsu7
: sorts are 7 bits, so the high bit is used to encode additional information.[T; n]
: a list of exactlyn
elements of typeT
p32<T>
: a 32 bit pointer toT
, relative to the start of the filep64<T>
: a 64 bit pointer toT
, relative to the start of the filep32?<T>
/p64?<T>
: a nullable pointer. If the value is zero then it is null, else it is a pointer toT
str4
: a fixed length 4 byte stringcstr
: a UTF-8 null terminated string(cmd, data)
: see below
Command pairs are denoted (cmd, data)
and use a variable length encoding, from 1 to 5 bytes. The low six bits of the first byte are cmd
, while the high two bits give the number of data
bytes:
00xxxxxx: cmd = x, data = 0
01xxxxxx yyyyyyyy: cmd = x, data = y
(1 bytedata
field)10xxxxxx yyyyyyyy yyyyyyyy: cmd = x, data = y
(2 bytedata
field)11xxxxxx yyyyyyyy yyyyyyyy yyyyyyyy yyyyyyyy: cmd = x, data = y
(4 bytedata
field)
The file header contains basic information about the format and pointers to the other tables in the file, and starts at the first byte of the file.
sizeof(header) = 40; align(header) = 8; header =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
magic |
str4 = "MM0B" = 0x42304D4D |
Indicates that this file uses MMB format |
version |
u8 = 1 |
Indicates the version of the MMB format in use; this document details version 1 . |
num_sorts |
u8 |
The number of sorts in the file. |
reserved |
u16 |
Reserved, should be set to 0 . |
num_terms |
u32 |
The number of term and def in the file. |
num_thms |
u32 |
The number of axiom and theorem in the file. |
p_terms |
p32<[term; num_terms]> |
The pointer to the term table. |
p_thms |
p32<[thm; num_thms]> |
The pointer to the theorem table. |
p_proof |
p32<proof_stream> |
The pointer to the proof stream. |
reserved2 |
u32 |
Reserved, should be set to 0 . |
p_index |
p64?<index> |
The pointer to the index. |
sorts (*) |
[sort_data; num_sorts] |
The sort table. |
(*) The sorts
field is not included in the header for the purpose of sizeof(header)
.
The sort table comes directly at the end of the header, and is a list of sort_data = u8
items that give the sort modifiers for each of the sorts.
Bit | Modifier |
---|---|
0 | pure |
1 | strict |
2 | provable |
3 | free |
4-7 | unused, set to 0 |
See mm0.md for a description of the sort modifiers.
The term table is an array [term; num_terms]
where term
is as follows:
sizeof(term) = 8; align(term) = 8; term =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
num_args |
u16 |
The number of arguments of the term constructor |
ret_sort |
u7 |
The sort of the return type. |
is_def |
u1 |
The high bit of ret_sort is 1 if this is a def . |
reserved |
u8 |
Reserved, should be set to 0 . |
p_data |
p32<term_data> |
Pointer to additional information. |
The p_data
field points to additional data term_data
for a term that cannot fit in these 8 bytes. Note that this data structure depends on the num_args
and is_def
fields of the relevant entry in the term table.
sizeof(term_data)
varies; align(term_data) = 8; term_data =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
args |
[arg; num_args] |
The arguments |
ret |
arg |
The return type |
unify (optional) |
p32<unify_stream> |
The unify stream, only present if is_def = 1 |
The type arg = u64
contains a bit array for storing the dependencies of a sort.
sizeof(arg) = 8; align(arg) = 8; arg =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
deps |
[u1; 55] |
Bit i is 1 if this arg depends on the i th bound variable |
reserved |
u1 |
Must be 0 . (reserved for extensions to allow >55 deps) |
sort |
u7 |
The sort of the type |
bound |
u1 |
True if this is a bound variable |
Note that bound variables must depend only on themselves in deps
, i.e. the i
th bound variable should have deps = 1 << i
. Also, the indexing of bound variables in deps
skips non-bound variables, but otherwise matches the ordering of the args
array. A non-bound variable cannot depend on bound variables that are declared later in the list.
The ret
field of the term_data
does not use bound
and sets it to 0
; also ret_sort
must agree with ret.sort
.
The theorem table is an array [thm; num_thms]
where thm
is as follows:
sizeof(thm) = 8; align(thm) = 8; thm =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
num_args |
u16 |
The number of (expression) arguments of the theorem |
reserved |
u16 |
Reserved, should be set to 0 . |
p_data |
p32<thm_data> |
Pointer to additional information. |
The p_data
field points to additional data thm_data
for a theorem that cannot fit in these 8 bytes. Note that this data structure depends on the num_args
field of the relevant entry in the theorem table.
sizeof(thm_data)
varies; align(thm_data) = 8; thm_data =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
args |
[arg; num_args] |
The arguments |
unify |
p32<unify_stream> |
The unify stream |
The interpretation of args
is the same as in the term table.
Definitions, axioms, and theorems contain a pointer to unify_stream
, which is an unaligned list of (cmd, data)
pairs (see Encoding and types) which continues until cmd = END = 0
. The valid commands in a unify stream (which are 6 bit opcodes) are:
Name | Value | data |
Summary (*) |
---|---|---|---|
UTerm |
0x30 |
term_id |
Apply term term_id |
UTermSave |
0x31 |
term_id |
Apply term term_id , and save this subterm to the heap |
URef |
0x32 |
heap_id |
Refer to heap element heap_id |
UDummy |
0x33 |
sort_id |
Create a new dummy with sort sort_id , apply and save it (only in def ) |
UHyp |
0x36 |
0 |
Start reading a new hypothesis (only in theorem /axiom ) |
END |
0x00 |
0 |
Not a command, signals the end of the stream |
(*) The summary column is not a complete description of the behavior of the command. See Unification for the full stack machine semantics.
The operations are written in "polish notation", where a term constructor like UTerm t
comes before the subterms. At the beginning of the unify stream, the heap is initialized with the variables in the order of declaration at indexes 0..num_args
, but the heap grows every time a UTermSave
or UDummy
operation is encountered, and is assigned the next available index.
Since a term is "saved" before the contents of the term are read, cyclic terms are representable in this encoding; for example UTermSave 0, URef 0
is the term x = (t0 x)
. Cyclic terms are not legal in MMB files.
For definitions, the unify stream encodes the value of the definition. For theorems and axioms, the unify stream has the pattern UHyp, <h1>, UHyp, <h2>, ..., UHyp, <hn>, <concl>
for a theorem with n
hypotheses, where each <hi>
is the encoding of the hypothesis expression and <concl>
is the encoding of the conclusion expression.
The END
terminator is redundant because it is possible to predict the end of the stream, since each UTerm[Save]
must be followed by num_args
subexpressions, URef
and UDummy
have no subexpressions, and UHyp
has two subexpressions (the first hypothesis and the remainder of the hypotheses and conclusion). A unify stream that terminates too early or too late is malformed.
To permit read-ahead, the END
terminator must begin at least 5 bytes prior to the end of the file. This is generally not a problem since unify streams are usually in the middle of the file.
The proof stream contains the proofs of all the theorems that have been declared in the term and theorem tables. It is an unaligned stream of (cmd, data)
pairs like the unify stream, but it has a two-level structure to enable fast scanning through the file.
The first command in the stream is a statement, and the data
field is a relative pointer that gives the number of bytes from the start of this statement to the start of the following statement.
The valid statements are:
Name | Value | Has proof stream? | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Sort |
0x04 |
No | Declares a new sort |
Term |
0x05 |
No | Declares a new term |
Def |
0x05 |
Yes | Declares a new pub def (*) |
LocalDef |
0x0D |
Yes | Declares a new def |
Axiom |
0x02 |
Yes | Declares a new axiom |
Thm |
0x06 |
Yes | Declares a new theorem |
LocalThm |
0x0E |
Yes | Declares a new local theorem |
END |
0x00 |
Not a statement, signals the end of the stream |
(*) Note that Term
and Def
have the same value; this is because the actual indication of whether this is a term
or def
is by looking at the is_def
field in the term table.
The verifier keeps track of how many sort
, term
/def
, and axiom
/theorem
items have been encountered, and each occurrence of a statement from each of these classes increments the respective counter, with the new index being the index into the sort, term, or theorem tables, respectively. All references to terms with an ID larger than the running count (i.e. forward references) are considered to be invalid.
For statements that do not have a proof stream, the next command will be the next statement (and the data
field for the statement will be the byte length of that single command). For statements that do have a proof stream, the next command will be a sequence of proof commands ending at END
, and the data
field will point immediately following the END
.
To permit read-ahead, the END
terminator denoting the end of the last statement must begin at least 5 bytes prior to the end of the file. This is potentially an issue if the file has no debugging index, since then the proof stream will be the last thing in the file and 4 bytes of padding need to be added.
The valid proof commands are:
Name | Value | data |
Summary (*) |
---|---|---|---|
Term |
0x10 |
term_id |
Apply term term_id |
TermSave |
0x11 |
term_id |
Apply term term_id , and save this subterm to the heap |
Ref |
0x12 |
heap_id |
Put heap element heap_id on the stack |
Dummy |
0x13 |
sort_id |
Create a new dummy with sort sort_id , apply and save it |
Thm |
0x14 |
thm_id |
Apply theorem thm_id |
ThmSave |
0x15 |
thm_id |
Apply theorem thm_id , and save it to the heap |
Hyp |
0x16 |
0 |
Add the expression just constructed as a hypothesis |
Conv |
0x17 |
0 |
Apply the conversion rule e1 = e2 /\ proof e2 -> proof e1 |
Refl |
0x18 |
0 |
Reflexivity conversion e = e |
Sym |
0x19 |
0 |
Symmetry of conversion e1 = e2 -> e2 = e1 |
Cong |
0x1A |
0 |
Congruence e1 = e1' /\ ... /\ en = en' -> t es = t es' |
Unfold |
0x1B |
0 |
Unfolding: e = e' -> D es = e' if D es unfolds to e |
ConvCut |
0x1C |
0 |
Prove a conversion e1 = e2 |
ConvSave |
0x1E |
0 |
Save a conversion e1 = e2 to the heap |
Save |
0x1F |
0 |
Save an element on the stack to the heap without popping it |
Sorry |
0x20 |
0 |
Push a proof of anything, or a conversion (**) |
END |
0x00 |
0 |
Not a command, signals the end of the stream |
(*) The summary column is not a complete description of the behavior of the command. See Proof checking for the full stack machine semantics.
(**) The Sorry
command is not a valid proof command, but is useful for generating partial proofs. Verifiers are permitted to not recognize its existence.
The proof commands construct a proof in reverse polish notation (meaning that constructors follow their arguments) as follows:
- Definitions construct the value of the definition
expr e
on the stack. (This is redundant with the unify stream encoded in the term table, but by checking one against the other we can ensure no cyclic terms.) - Axioms and theorems first construct each hypothesis and then use
Hyp
to add them to the hypothesis list, and then axioms constructexpr concl
and theorems constructproof concl
.
There is no difference between local and public theorems/defs in terms of verification, but sorts, terms, axioms, public theorems, and public defs require reading the next statement in the MM0 file and ensuring that it matches the current statement in the MMB file. Local theorems and local defs do not require any corresponding statement in the MM0 file.
The proof stream is a sequence of commands that are designed to operate on a stack machine with the following components:
S
: The (main) stack, which starts empty and on which most commands operate. The valid stack elements are:expr e
ore
:e
is an expressionproof e
or|- e
:e
is a proven expressione1 = e2
: A conversion proofe1 =?= e2
: A conversion obligation
H
: The heap, which is initialized to the list of all the variables, and can contain all kinds of stack elements excepte1 =?= e2
.HS
: The list of hypotheses to the current theorem, which starts empty and grows onHyp
commands.next_bv
: The number of active bound variables, which is initialized to the number of bound variables in the declaration and is incremented onDummy
calls
The backing store is not mentioned explicitly in the description but holds the memory for all constructed s-expressions. In particular, operations like Term
that allocate a new expression are considered distinct from any previously constructed expression, so equality testing, such as is required by the Refl
command and in unification, is pointer equality, not structural equality. For example, Term 0, Term 0
constructs t0, t0'
on the stack, but if these ended up in a reflexivity obligation t0 =?= t0'
then a proof that applied Refl
would not be valid. To actually get the same term twice it is required to use Save
and Ref
, as in TermSave(0), Ref(0)
which puts t0, t0
on the stack.
During operation, we pre-calculate certain metadata about allocated expressions:
bound(e)
is true ife
is a bound variable (a variable withargs[i].bound = true
), or a dummy variable. All composite expressions havebound(t ...) = false
.sort(e)
is the sort of the expressionV(e)
is the set of variables ine
V(xi)
is{xi}
ifxi
is a variable withbound(x)
V(xi)
isargs[i].deps
ifxi
is a variableV(t e1 ... en)
isV(e1) ∪ ... ∪ V(en)
FV(e)
is the set of free variables ine
FV(xi)
is the same asV(xi)
on variablesFV(t e1 ... en)
isS1 ∪ ... ∪ Sn ∪ T
where- if
term[t].args[i].bound
,Si = FV(ei)
- otherwise
Si
isFV(ei)
minus the union ofFV(e[bv[j]])
over allj
such thatterm[t].args[i].deps[j]
, andbv[j]
is thej
'th bound variable T
is the union ofFV(e[bv[j]])
over allj
such thatterm[t].ret.deps[j]
- if
Because V
is used only in theorem proofs and BV
only in definitions, mm0-c
will cache one or the other depending on which kind of statement is being proven.
The proof opcodes have the following operation on the state:
-
Term t: H; S, e1, ..., en --> H; S, (t e1 ... en)
Term t
does the following:- Look up
term[t]
, which must be a validterm
ordef
. - Let
n = term[t].num_args
- Pop
e1
, ...,en
in reverse order (soe1
is deepest on the stack before the operation) - For each argument
ei
, check thatsort(ei) = term[t].args[i].sort
, and ifterm[t].args[i].bound
thenbound(ei)
. - Allocate
(t e1 ... en)
withsort(t e1 ... en) = term[t].ret_sort
- Push
(t e1 ... en)
on the stack
- Look up
-
TermSave t = Term t, Save TermSave t: H; S, e1, ..., en --> H, (t e1 ... en); S, (t e1 ... en)
TermSave t
has exactly the same effect asTerm t, Save
. Specifically, it constructs the expression(t e1 ... en)
, and puts it on both the stack and on the heap. -
Ref i: H; S, e1 =?= e2 --> H; S (if H[i] = (e1 = e2)) Ref i: H; S --> H; S, H[i] (otherwise)
Ref i
does the following:- Look up
H[i]
, which should be in range of the heap. - If
H[i] = e
or|- e
, push it to the stack. - If
H[i] = (e1 = e2)
, pope1 =?= e2
and ensure that the expressions match.
- Look up
-
Dummy s: H; S --> H, x; S, x
Dummy s
does the following:- Look up
sort[s]
, which must be a validsort
such that!sort[s].strict
. - Let
x = var(next_bv)
be a new bound variable, and incrementnext_bv
- Allocate
x
withsort(x) = s
- Push
x
on the stack and the heap
- Look up
-
Thm T: H; S, e1, ..., en, e --> H; S', |- e where Unify(T): S; e1, ..., en; e --> S'; H'; .
Thm T
is only valid in proofs ofaxiom
andtheorem
.Thm T
does the following:- Look up
thm[T]
, which must be a validaxiom
ortheorem
. - Let
n = thm[T].num_args
- Pop expression
e
- Pop
e1
, ...,en
in reverse order (soe1
is deepest on the stack before the operation) - Initialize
uheap := []
- For each argument
ei
:- check that
sort(ei) = thm[T].args[i].sort
- If
thm[T].args[i].bound
:- check that
bound(ei)
. - check that
FV(e') ∩ FV(ei) = {}
for alle'
inuheap
- push
FV(ei)
todeps
- check that
- Otherwise:
- For each
j
such thatthm[T].args[i].deps[j]
:- check that
deps[j] ∩ FV(ei) = {}
- check that
- For each
- Push
ei
touheap
- check that
- Run unification for
thm[T].unify
, withuheap
as the original unification heap and with[e]
on the unification stack. The unifier also has access to the main stack and may pop theorem hypotheses as necessary. - Push
|- e
to the stack.
- Look up
-
ThmSave T = Thm T, Save
ThmSave T
has exactly the same effect asThm T, Save
. Specifically, it applies theoremT
and puts the conclusion|- e
on both the stack and on the heap. -
Hyp: HS; H; S, e --> HS, e; H, |- e; S
Hyp
is only valid in proofs ofaxiom
andtheorem
.Hyp
does the following:- Pop
e
. - Ensure that
sorts[sort(e)].provable
. - Push
e
to the hypothesis list. - Push
|- e
to the heap.
- Pop
-
Conv: S, e1, |- e2 --> S, |- e1, e1 =?= e2
- Pop
|- e2
, pope1
, push|- e1
, pushe1 =?= e2
.
- Pop
-
Refl: S, e =?= e --> S
- Pop
e1 =?= e2
, ensure thate1
ande2
are equal. (Reminder: this is O(1) pointer equality)
- Pop
-
Symm: S, e1 =?= e2 --> S, e2 =?= e1
- Pop
e1 =?= e2
, pushe2 =?= e1
.
- Pop
-
Cong: S, (t e1 ... en) =?= (t e1' ... en') --> S, en =?= en', ..., e1 =?= e1'
- Pop
(t e1 ... en) =?= (t e1' ... en')
. - Ensure that both expressions are term constructors for the same
t
. - Push
en =?= en
, ...,e1 =?= e1
. (Note that the obligations are pushed in reverse order.)
- Pop
-
Unfold: S, (t e1 ... en) =?= e', e --> S, e =?= e' where Unify(t): e1, ..., en; e --> H'; .
- Pop
e
. - Pop
(t e1 ... en) =?= e'
. - Ensure that
t
is a term constructor such thatterm[t].is_def
. - Run unification for
term[t].unify
, with[e1, ..., en]
as the original unification heap and with[e]
on the unification stack. - Push
e =?= e'
.
- Pop
-
ConvCut: S, e1 =?= e2 --> S, e1 = e2, e1 =?= e2
- Pop
e1 =?= e2
, pushe1 = e2
, pushe1 =?= e2
.
- Pop
-
ConvSave: H; S, e1 = e2 --> H, e1 = e2; S
- Pop
e1 = e2
, pushe1 = e2
to the heap.
- Pop
-
Save: H; S, s --> H, s; S, s
- Pop any stack element
s
. - Ensure
s
is not a convertibility obligatione1 =?= e2
- Push
s
to the heap and the stack.
- Pop any stack element
-
Sorry: S, e -> S, |- e Sorry: S, e1 =?= e2 -> S
Pop a stack element
s
:- If
s = e
, push|- e
to the stack. - If
s = (e1 =?= e2)
, do nothing. - Record that
Sorry
was used. Verifiers that signal successful verification using exit codes are required to report failure for proofs usingSorry
, although they can use implementation-defined printing to distinguish proofs-modulo-Sorry
from malformed proofs.
- If
Unification is called during proof checking, in the Unfold
and Thm
rules, as well as when verifying Def
statements. The unifier uses the following state:
MS
: The main stack (which was calledS
in the previous section) is consulted to get hypotheses, but is not otherwise used.S
: The unify stack, which contains expressions that have yet to be unified. Unification starts with a single expression on the unify stack, and it should be empty when unification is done.H
: The unify heap, which contains substitutions, and is extended byUDummy
andUTermSave
steps. It is initialized to the list of substitutions to the variables in thetheorem
ordef
.
The action of the unify commands is as follows:
-
URef i: H; S, H[i] --> H; S
- Pop
e
, ensure thate = H[i]
. (Reminder: this is O(1) pointer equality)
- Pop
-
UTerm t: S, (t e1 ... en) --> S, en, ..., e1
- Pop
e
. - Ensure that
e = (t e1 ... en)
is a term constructor with headt
. - Push
en
, ...,e1
. (Note that the expressions are pushed in reverse order.)
- Pop
-
UTermSave t = USave, UTerm t UTermSave t: H; S, (t e1 ... en) --> H, (t e1 ... en); S, en, ..., e1
UTermSave t
has exactly the same effect asUSave, UTerm t
. Specifically, it pops the expression(t e1 ... en)
, puts it on the heap, and puts the subexpressions on the stack in reverse order. -
UDummy s: H; S, x --> H, x; S
UDummy
is only allowed indef
declarations.- Pop
x
. - Ensure that
x
is a variable andsort(x) = s
. - Ensure that
V(e) ∩ V(x) = {}
for alle
inH
. - Push
x
to the unify heap.
- Pop
-
UHyp: MS, |- e; S --> MS; S, e
UHyp
is only allowed intheorem
declarations.- Pop
|- e
from the main stack. - Push
e
to the unify stack.
- Pop
-
USave: H; S, e --> H, e; S, e
(
USave
is not an available opcode but is used to describe the operation ofUTermSave
.)- Pop
e
, pushe
to the heap and the stack.
- Pop
The p_index
field in the header points to an index
which contains a list of index entries.
sizeof(index)
varies; align(index) = 8; index =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
num_entries |
u64 |
The number of index entries |
entries |
[index_entry; num_entries] |
The index entries |
Each index entry has a type
which determines the meaning of the fields.
sizeof(index_entry) = 16; align(index_entry) = 8; index_entry =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
type |
str4 |
The type of table |
data |
u32 |
Varies |
ptr |
u64 |
Varies |
The collection of valid type
settings is open-ended, but extensions should coordinate in order to avoid overlaps. The following table types are defined:
type |
data |
ptr |
Description |
---|---|---|---|
"Name" = 0x656D614E |
0 |
p64<names> |
String names for sorts, terms, and theorems |
"VarN" = 0x4E726156 |
0 |
p64<var_names> |
String names for variables |
"HypN" = 0x4E726156 |
0 |
p64<hyp_names> |
String names for hypotheses |
align(names) = 8; names =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
sorts |
[name_entry; num_sorts] |
The names of sorts |
terms |
[name_entry; num_terms] |
The names of terms |
thms |
[name_entry; num_thms] |
The names of theorems |
Each name entry consists of a pointer to the statement in the proof stream where it was introduced, and a UTF-8 C string with the name. (MM0 itself doesn't support non-ASCII names, but the names listed here are allowed to include arbitrary unicode.)
sizeof(name_entry) = 16; align(name_entry) = 8; name_entry =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
proof |
p64?<proof_stream> |
A pointer to this statement in the proof stream |
name |
p64?<cstr> |
A pointer to the name string |
align(var_names) = 8; var_names =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
term_vars |
[p64?<str_list>; num_terms] |
The list of variables in a term /def |
thm_vars |
[p64?<str_list>; num_thms] |
The list of variables in a axiom /theorem |
The str_list
type is just a list of pointers to UTF-8 null-terminated strings:
sizeof(str_list)
varies; align(str_list) = 8; str_list =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
num_strs |
u64 |
The number of strings in the list |
strs |
[p64?<cstr>; num_strs] |
A list of string pointers |
The list term_vars[t]
is the list of variable names in term[t]
in the order of declaration, but the list continues past num_args
to include the dummies, named by order of appearance of Dummy
steps in the proof stream, which happens to coincide with the order of UDummy
steps in the unify stream version. Similarly, the thm_vars[T]
list gives the variable names in thm[T]
, including the dummy variables.
align(hyp_names) = 8; hyp_names =
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
thm_hyps |
[p64?<str_list>; num_thms] |
The list of hypotheses in a axiom /theorem |
The hyp_names
table is similar to var_names
, and reuses the str_list
type. The list gives the names of hypotheses in the order of Hyp
commands in the statement.