You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is an awesome pipeline! One additional suggestion would be to provide some summary stats for how many / what percent of genes and isoforms were annotated to the different databases (perhaps also including some way to quantify real annotations vs "uncharacterized protein", etc) . Also, including some code for how to convert the final parsed .csv file dammit contig IDs to the original Trinity contig names would be really useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is an awesome pipeline! One additional suggestion would be to provide some summary stats for how many / what percent of genes and isoforms were annotated to the different databases (perhaps also including some way to quantify real annotations vs "uncharacterized protein", etc) . Also, including some code for how to convert the final parsed .csv file dammit contig IDs to the original Trinity contig names would be really useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: