Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DST Staging Review: Error in "Editable prefilled information displayed in a card with an edit link" #3375

Open
shiragoodman opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@shiragoodman
Copy link
Collaborator

shiragoodman commented Oct 15, 2024

Need help? Please review how to read a Staging Review ticket. Tag @platform-governance-team-members on Slack if you need further assistance.

Design System Staging Information

Component: Help users to... Know when their information is prefilled
Staging Review ticket: AEDP, Design Patterns, Help users to... Know when their information is prefilled

Findings details

VA.gov Experience Standard - issue: User encounters design components or patterns that are inconsistent or confusing.
VA.gov Experience Standard - category: Consistency
This is an issue with the:
High-priority: No
Collab Cycle Reviewer: @KKitagawa-Bosch (content)

Description

In the paragraph following "Editable prefilled information displayed in a card with an edit link", the copy reads "Prefilled information the is editable . . . "

Recommended action

Replace the word "the" with "that"

References

  • Accessibility Defect Severity: N/A
  • WCAG Success Criteria: N/A
  • Modality: N/A
  • Design System Pattern or Template: N/A
  • Design System Foundation: N/A
  • Content Style Guide: Content principles
  • Context: N/A

Next Steps for DST

  • Close the ticket when the issue has been resolved or validated by your Product Owner
  • If your team has additional questions or needs Governance help validating the issue, please comment on the ticket
  • If this ticket has a high-priority label, please address as soon as possible so VFS teams are not impacted
  • If this ticket has a consider label, please consider for future implementation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants