You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Summary:
We’ve encountered recurring problems with the depth of recursive opt types. When the depth is too large, it results in type errors because the type becomes too deep to handle effectively.
Current Situation:
The default depth for opt was initially set to 5 but has already been reduced to 4 to mitigate these issues.
While this adjustment has helped, it’s not a comprehensive solution.
Challenges:
Reducing the depth further (e.g., to 3) might not be a viable long-term solution as it could limit functionality.
The issue occurs infrequently, so it’s not an urgent priority at the moment, but it still points to a need for a more robust approach.
Next Steps:
Investigate alternative strategies to handle recursive opt types without reducing depth further.
Prioritize research into solutions as the frequency or impact of these errors increases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary:
We’ve encountered recurring problems with the depth of recursive
opt
types. When the depth is too large, it results in type errors because the type becomes too deep to handle effectively.Current Situation:
opt
was initially set to 5 but has already been reduced to 4 to mitigate these issues.Challenges:
Next Steps:
opt
types without reducing depth further.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: