Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider allowing certain commands to run even if a provider is not present #719

Open
mildwonkey opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mildwonkey
Copy link
Contributor

mildwonkey commented Oct 9, 2024

As a validation developer, I may want to run a command such as lula dev get-resources to verify the outputs. This currently fails if the input file doesn't pass schema validation. It would be nice if lula dev get-resources could run successfully even without a provider present in the input file.

I imagine there is a broader possibility for other commands to work as long as the necessary subset of the overall schema is present, we can re-write this or break it into smaller issues as needed.

@mildwonkey mildwonkey added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 9, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Awaiting triage from the team label Oct 9, 2024
@mildwonkey mildwonkey changed the title Consider allowing certain commands to run even if a domain is not present Consider allowing certain commands to run even if a provider is not present Oct 9, 2024
@brandtkeller brandtkeller removed the triage Awaiting triage from the team label Oct 18, 2024
@brandtkeller brandtkeller moved this from 🆕 New to 🔖 Ready in Lula and Friends Oct 18, 2024
@brandtkeller brandtkeller added this to the Aligned Capabilities milestone Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: 🔖 Ready
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants