Using fastrand? #461
Closed
mwcampbell
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@mwcampbell unfortunately we do. We actually used to use fastrand but then switched. See d4c7666. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I'm not convinced that the benefits outweigh the complexity, so I'll focus elsewhere. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Do any of zbus's uses of random number generation require a cryptographically secure random number generator? If not, we could use fastrand, as a few of zbus's transitive dependencies already do, and eliminate the dependency on the rand crates, as well as reducing code size a little.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions