Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Core] Updates to docs.getdbt.com in preparation for 1.9 RC #6488

Closed
1 task done
mirnawong1 opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6537
Closed
1 task done

[Core] Updates to docs.getdbt.com in preparation for 1.9 RC #6488

mirnawong1 opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6537
Assignees
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt-core v1.9 improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

For 1.9 RC, we need to do the following:

  • Remove beta flag (dropdown)
  • Set expiration date
  • Update version tables (GA now)

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

https://docs.getdbt.com/

Additional information

No response

@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear dbt-core v1.9 labels Nov 14, 2024
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 changed the title [Core] Update docs framework [Core] Update docs.getdbt.com framework for 1.9 RC Nov 14, 2024
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 changed the title [Core] Update docs.getdbt.com framework for 1.9 RC [Core] Updates to docs.getdbt.com in preparation for 1.9 RC Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt-core v1.9 improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants