You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Multilingual: It broadens the model's language reasoning, understanding and adaptability.
Auto-translation with randomized languages: It introduces linguistic diversity and helps in reasoning generalization.
Intentional ~10% error rate: It mimics real-world data imperfections and can improve model reasoning robustness.
Cleaning refusals: It ensures more usable data.
Give reasoning examples: For answers, human mistakes, Ai mistakes when prompting for ~5% of the questions.
Multiple regenerations with slight variations: This increases data diversity and helps prevent overfitting.
Comprehensive prompt engineering techniques: like (Chain - Tree - Train - Reflection - Constraint - Negative - Comparative - Iterative - etc.), leverage prompting various methods to enhance reasoning performance.
This strategy is key for success and incorporates several advanced techniques. It's like creating a linguistic and reasoning obstacle course for the AI, pushing it to become more versatile and resilient.
However, a few considerations:
Ensure the 10% error rate doesn't skew critical information and data.
Be cautious with auto-translation to maintain context and nuance.
Monitor for any unintended biases introduced through this process.
This approach mimics how our brains learn - through exposure, mistakes, and varied contexts. It's how can mirror human learning processes in AI training!🚀
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Key hints:
Multilingual: It broadens the model's language reasoning, understanding and adaptability.
Auto-translation with randomized languages: It introduces linguistic diversity and helps in reasoning generalization.
Intentional ~10% error rate: It mimics real-world data imperfections and can improve model reasoning robustness.
Cleaning refusals: It ensures more usable data.
Give reasoning examples: For answers, human mistakes, Ai mistakes when prompting for ~5% of the questions.
Multiple regenerations with slight variations: This increases data diversity and helps prevent overfitting.
Comprehensive prompt engineering techniques: like (Chain - Tree - Train - Reflection - Constraint - Negative - Comparative - Iterative - etc.), leverage prompting various methods to enhance reasoning performance.
This strategy is key for success and incorporates several advanced techniques. It's like creating a linguistic and reasoning obstacle course for the AI, pushing it to become more versatile and resilient.
However, a few considerations:
Ensure the 10% error rate doesn't skew critical information and data.
Be cautious with auto-translation to maintain context and nuance.
Monitor for any unintended biases introduced through this process.
This approach mimics how our brains learn - through exposure, mistakes, and varied contexts. It's how can mirror human learning processes in AI training!🚀
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions