account for _acpc present for some T1s?

[yarikoptic]

Now seeing a diff of #4, I wondered if there is a need/way to account for _acpc in some of the original names - does it mean that they were may be original (aligned to acpc during scaning) or it was realigned into a new space?

So it might be worth adding a corresponding _space- entity to the files to make it clear what spaces they are in.

[loj]

I completely agree that it would be nice to add the space label.

does it mean that they were may be original (aligned to acpc during scaning) or it was realigned into a new space?

This is something @adswa and I tried to figure out (see #1 ). We ended up deciding to leave out the space label, because we weren't sure of the correct keyword to use.

Any insights/suggestions you have for what the space keyword should be for these images is most welcome. :-)

[yarikoptic]

Oh, sorry that I had missed that discussion (although managed to even follow up on it ;)). I think the best would be to just ask larger BIDS community. Since this one specifically feels like just an omission, I filed bids-standard/bids-specification#473 . Feel welcome to chime in ;) in general -- feel welcome to ask "core" BIDS ppl (either on neurostars, in google groups, or I think it is ok on bids-specification issues if you feel that something is relevant but omitted)

[yarikoptic]

Please have a look at bids-standard/bids-specification#473 (comment) and clarify of my observation is correct there

[loj]

I wish I could, but I don't have a good enough understanding of this to clarify whether or not your observation is correct.

[yarikoptic]

When I am in such a situation I just ask those who should know the best - authors. Could you please ask on hcp mailing list? May be @adswa could help? Would also be valuable to get their (hcp) feedback on conversion script/result