ci: prebuilt librocksdb in docker image #2318
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the Docker image build process and updating GitHub Actions workflows. Key modifications include the addition of a new input parameter for AWS region in the Docker action, adjustments to job dependencies and conditions in the testing workflows, and improvements to the Dockerfile for building the RocksDB library. Additionally, updates to Rust dependency management workflows and the introduction of new environment variables for Snappy integration are included. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml (2)
20-21: Document the rationale for architecture change.The switch from ARM64 to AMD64 (both runner and Docker platform) is a significant architectural change. Please update the PR description to include:
- Reasoning behind moving away from self-hosted runners
- Justification for the architecture change
- Impact assessment on build performance and deployment
Also applies to: 45-45
45-45: Consider supporting multi-arch builds.Since this workflow is building a base image that includes RocksDB, consider supporting multiple architectures to maintain compatibility across different environments. This can be achieved using Docker's
buildxmulti-arch build support.Example modification:
- platform: linux/amd64 + platform: linux/amd64,linux/arm64Note: This would require appropriate build configuration for RocksDB across architectures.
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
50-52: Consider adding documentation for the librocksdb precompilation step.While the implementation is correct, adding comments or documentation about the librocksdb precompilation process would help future maintainers understand:
- Why this step is necessary
- What artifacts are being cached
- Any prerequisites or dependencies
Dockerfile (1)
155-155: Parameterize the RocksDB version using a build argumentDefining the RocksDB version as a build argument
ROCKSDB_VERSIONallows for easier updates and maintenance.Apply this diff:
+ARG ROCKSDB_VERSION=v8.10.2 RUN git clone https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git -b $ROCKSDB_VERSION --depth 1 . && \
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)Dockerfile(5 hunks)packages/rs-dpp/Cargo.toml(2 hunks)packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_transfer_transition/v0/v0_methods.rs(1 hunks)packages/rs-drive-abci/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml (1)
20-21: Verify compatibility with deployment environment.
The switch from self-hosted ARM64 to GitHub-hosted AMD64 runners represents a significant change in the build architecture. Please ensure that:
- The target deployment environment supports AMD64 images
- There are no ARM64-specific dependencies or optimizations that might be affected
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that the Dockerfile already has multi-architecture support built in through TARGETARCH build arguments and conditional logic for both ARM64 and x86_64 architectures. Let me verify the GitHub Actions workflow configuration to see if there are any platform-specific build configurations.
Architecture change is well-supported, but needs documentation
The switch from ARM64 to AMD64 appears to be safe as:
- The Dockerfile already supports multi-architecture builds through
TARGETARCHvariables - Architecture-specific dependencies (protoc, sccache) are handled conditionally
- The workflow pushes to ECR, which supports multi-arch images
However, please:
- Document the rationale for switching to AMD64-only builds in the PR description
- Consider enabling multi-arch builds in the future by using matrix strategy if ARM64 support is needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for ARM64-specific configurations or dependencies
# that might be affected by the architecture change
# Test: Search for ARM64/AARCH64 specific configurations
rg -i "arm64|aarch64" --type yaml --type dockerfile
# Test: Check Dockerfile for architecture-specific instructions
fd Dockerfile --type f --exec grep -i "arch"
Length of output: 1253
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the workflow file for platform configurations
cat .github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml
Length of output: 1803
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_transfer_transition/v0/v0_methods.rs (2)
55-66: LGTM! Code refactoring improves readability.
The error handling has been streamlined using method chaining with ok_or_else, which is a more idiomatic Rust approach. The logic remains unchanged while reducing code complexity.
Let's verify that this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar error handling patterns that might need similar improvements
rg -A 3 "DesiredKeyWithTypePurposeSecurityLevelMissing.*no transfer public key"55-66: Verify PR objectives alignment.
This code change appears to be a standalone improvement unrelated to the PR's main objective of prebuilding librocksdb. While the change is beneficial, it might be better suited for a separate PR focused on code quality improvements.
Let's check if there are related changes in other files:
packages/rs-drive-abci/Cargo.toml (2)
34-34: Verify the impact of disabled default features for rust_decimal.
The default-features = false configuration for rust_decimal might exclude important functionality. Please ensure that all required features are explicitly enabled.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as I have enough information about how rust_decimal is used in the codebase. The usage patterns show basic decimal operations (arithmetic, comparisons) and no advanced features that would require default features:
Disabling default features for rust_decimal is safe in this codebase
The codebase only uses basic decimal operations that don't require default features:
- Basic arithmetic (multiplication, division, addition)
- Conversions (from/to primitive types)
- Comparison operations
- Floor operations
- Decimal constants via macros
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any code relies on default features of rust_decimal
# Search for rust_decimal usage patterns that might depend on default features
rg -A 5 'rust_decimal::|Decimal::|use.*rust_decimal'
Length of output: 13885
34-35: Major version update requires careful verification.
The update from rust_decimal 1.2.5 to 1.36.0 and rust_decimal_macros from 1.25.0 to 1.36.0 represents a significant version jump that may include breaking changes.
Consider:
- Reviewing the rust_decimal changelog for breaking changes
- Adding regression tests for decimal operations
- Documenting the reason for this major version update, especially since it seems unrelated to the PR's main objective of prebuilding librocksdb
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage of rust_decimal in the codebase to make a final determination.
From the search results, I can see that rust_decimal is primarily used in the following ways:
- Fee calculations and distributions in
rs-dpp/src/fee/epoch/distribution.rs - Epoch time calculations in
rs-drive-abci/src/platform_types/epoch_info/v0/mod.rs - Fee pool distribution calculations in
rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/fee_pool_outwards_distribution/
The usage patterns are straightforward and mainly involve:
- Basic arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /)
- Conversions using
Decimal::fromandtry_into() - Decimal constants using
dec!macro - Simple rounding with
floor()andround()
These are core features that have remained stable across rust_decimal versions. The update from 1.2.5 to 1.36.0 primarily added new features and optimizations rather than breaking changes to these core functionalities.
Version update appears safe for current usage.
- The codebase uses basic decimal arithmetic and conversion operations that are part of rust_decimal's stable API
- All decimal operations are properly bounded (e.g., percentage calculations, time conversions)
- Extensive test coverage exists for decimal calculations in fee distribution
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in decimal handling
# Search for decimal-related operations that might be affected
rg -A 5 'Decimal::from|Decimal::new|dec!|\.round\(|\.scale\('
# Look for any decimal-related test files
fd -e rs test.*decimal
Length of output: 22915
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (1)
113-113: LGTM: AWS region propagation is necessary for Docker builds
The addition of AWS_REGION to build arguments is a logical enhancement, ensuring consistent AWS region configuration across the build process. This is particularly important since the action already uses AWS services for caching and will now support RocksDB prebuilding.
Let's verify how this AWS region is used in the Dockerfile:
✅ Verification successful
AWS region propagation is properly configured
The AWS region is correctly propagated and used in the Docker build process. From the analysis:
- The
AWS_REGIONbuild arg is passed to the Docker build command and is sourced from the requiredregioninput parameter - The region is used in multiple critical components:
- SCCACHE_REGION for Rust compilation caching
- S3 bucket region configuration for layer caching
- RocksDB prebuild caching
The change is necessary and properly implemented to ensure consistent AWS region configuration across all AWS-dependent services in the build process.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how AWS_REGION build arg is used in Dockerfile
# Test: Search for AWS_REGION usage in Dockerfile. Expect: ARG declaration and usage in RocksDB build stage
# Look for AWS_REGION in Dockerfile
echo "Searching for AWS_REGION usage in Dockerfile..."
rg "AWS_REGION" -A 3 -B 3
# Look for any S3/AWS related operations that might need region configuration
echo "Searching for potential AWS/S3 operations..."
rg -i "s3\.|aws\." -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 260
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find Dockerfile and check its contents
echo "Finding Dockerfile locations..."
fd Dockerfile
# Once found, let's also check for any environment variables or build args
# that might be related to AWS configuration
echo "Checking Dockerfile contents for AWS-related configuration..."
fd Dockerfile --exec cat {} \;
# Additionally, let's check the action file itself to understand the AWS region usage
echo "Checking action.yaml for AWS region context..."
cat .github/actions/docker/action.yaml
Length of output: 24468
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
42-45: LGTM! The conditional job execution is well implemented.
The changes to the build-rust-deps job are well structured:
- Depends on the
changesjob to avoid unnecessary builds - Only runs when Rust packages are modified (
needs.changes.outputs.rs-packages != '[]')
Let's verify the AWS configuration is properly set up:
✅ Verification successful
AWS credentials configuration is properly implemented
The AWS configuration in the workflow is consistent with other workflow files and follows security best practices:
- Uses GitHub secrets for sensitive credentials (
AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID,AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY,AWS_REGION) - Matches the pattern used in other workflow files
- Leverages the official
aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4action across the repository
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify AWS configuration in workflow files
# Expected: AWS_REGION should be consistently used across workflow files
# Check for AWS configuration in other workflow files
rg -l 'AWS_REGION|AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID|AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 522
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the AWS configuration patterns across these files
# to ensure consistency in AWS credentials and region usage
# Check the specific AWS configuration patterns in workflow files
rg -A 2 -B 2 'AWS_REGION:|AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID:|AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY:' .github/workflows/
# Also check if there are any AWS credential actions being used
rg -A 2 -B 2 'aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 6739
packages/rs-dpp/Cargo.toml (2)
32-32: LGTM: Trailing comma addition.
The addition of a trailing comma after the "eddsa" feature is a good practice in Rust for better maintainability and cleaner diffs when adding new features.
61-62: Verify the scope and impact of rust_decimal updates.
The updates to rust_decimal and rust_decimal_macros (1.29.1 → 1.36.0) seem unrelated to the PR's objective of prebuilding librocksdb. Additionally, disabling default features for rust_decimal could impact functionality.
Let's verify the dependency changes across the workspace:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
rust_decimal updates are coordinated across packages and safe to proceed
The dependency updates are actually coordinated across the workspace:
- Both
rs-drive-abciandrs-dpppackages use the same version (1.36.0) - Both packages consistently disable default features
- Usage patterns (
Decimal,ToPrimitive,decmacro) are standard and stable across versions
The changes appear to be part of a coordinated dependency update rather than an unrelated modification. The disabled default features are consistently applied across packages, indicating an intentional optimization strategy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check rust_decimal usage and features across the workspace
echo "Checking rust_decimal usage:"
rg --type toml 'rust_decimal.*=.*' -A 2
echo -e "\nChecking for potential breaking changes:"
rg --type rust 'rust_decimal' -l | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg 'use.*rust_decimal|rust_decimal::' "$file"
done
Length of output: 3308
lklimek
force-pushed
the
build/prebuild-rocksdb-docker
branch
from
390c0ca to
cb28ec2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
Dockerfile (6)
20-20: Update AWS region documentationThe documentation for AWS region configuration is incomplete. It should mention that
SCCACHE_REGIONcan be optionally set to overrideAWS_REGION.Apply this diff:
-# - SCCACHE_BUCKET, AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, AWS_REGION, SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX - store caches in S3 +# - SCCACHE_BUCKET, AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, AWS_REGION, SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX - store caches in S3 +# - SCCACHE_REGION - optional, defaults to AWS_REGION if not set
106-108: Consider adding a comment in the env fileAdding a header comment in the env file would help identify its purpose and warn against manual modifications.
Apply this diff:
-RUN touch /root/env +RUN echo "# This file is automatically generated during the Docker build process." > /root/env && \ + echo "# Manual modifications to this file will be lost." >> /root/env
210-211: Remove TODO commentThe TODO comment about joining code appears to be obsolete as the commands are already properly joined with
&&.Apply this diff:
-# TODO join with code below && \
217-224: Consider optimizing RocksDB buildThe RocksDB build process could be optimized by:
- Using build flags to reduce binary size
- Cleaning up unnecessary files after build
Apply this diff:
RUN source /root/env && \ - make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ + PORTABLE=1 make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ mkdir -p /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib && \ cp librocksdb.a /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/ && \ cp -r include /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/ && \ cd / && \ rm -rf /tmp/rocksdb && \ + strip /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/librocksdb.a && \ if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi
271-274: Consolidate duplicate ARG declarationsThe same ARGs for sccache credentials are declared multiple times across different build stages. While this is necessary for security, consider adding a comment explaining why this duplication is required.
Add this comment before each duplicate ARG declaration:
+# These ARGs must be declared in each stage where they are needed +# as ARG values are not persisted across stages for security reasons ARG ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN ARG AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEYAlso applies to: 297-300, 350-353
338-339: Consider adding binary verificationAfter copying the built binary, consider adding basic verification steps to ensure it's properly built.
Apply this diff:
cp /platform/target/${OUT_DIRECTORY}/drive-abci /artifacts/ && \ + # Verify the binary + /artifacts/drive-abci --version && \ if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)Dockerfile(7 hunks)packages/rs-dpp/Cargo.toml(2 hunks)packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_transfer_transition/v0/v0_methods.rs(1 hunks)packages/rs-drive-abci/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- .github/actions/docker/action.yaml
- .github/workflows/tests.yml
- packages/rs-dpp/Cargo.toml
- packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_transfer_transition/v0/v0_methods.rs
- packages/rs-drive-abci/Cargo.toml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml (1)
20-21: Verify the impact of changing from self-hosted runner to managed runner
The switch from a self-hosted ARM64 runner to GitHub-hosted ubuntu-24.04 runner could affect build performance and caching strategies. Please ensure:
- Build times are acceptable on the new runner
- All required dependencies are available on ubuntu-24.04
- Build cache strategies are adjusted accordingly
Dockerfile (3)
8-11: LGTM: Clear documentation of build stages
The documentation clearly explains the build stages and their dependencies, making it easier to understand the build process.
158-193: LGTM: Well-structured sccache configuration
The conditional logic for configuring different sccache backends is well-structured and handles secrets appropriately by not writing them to the env file.
264-264: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Lock cargo-chef version
The cargo-chef version should be locked to ensure reproducible builds.
Apply this diff:
- cargo install --profile "$CARGO_BUILD_PROFILE" [email protected] [email protected] --locked
+ cargo install --profile "$CARGO_BUILD_PROFILE" [email protected] [email protected] --locked --version 0.1.67Likely invalid or redundant comment.
lklimek
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
.github/actions/rust/action.yaml (1)
Line range hint
38-38: Track TODOs for workflow optimizationMultiple TODOs indicate a plan to optimize the workflow by moving dependency installation (Rust toolchain, protoc, clang) to a daily-built AMI. This would significantly improve CI performance by reducing installation time during workflow runs.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these optimization tasks? I can help create separate issues for:
- Moving Rust toolchain installation to AMI
- Moving protoc installation to AMI
- Moving clang installation to AMI
- Setting up daily AMI builds
Also applies to: 73-73, 117-117
Dockerfile (5)
20-21: Consider documenting S3 key prefix parameterThe
SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIXbuild argument is used but not documented in the build arguments section.Apply this diff:
# - SCCACHE_BUCKET, AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, AWS_REGION, SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX - store caches in S3 +# - SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX - prefix for S3 keys, useful for organizing caches by project or branch # - SCCACHE_MEMCACHED - set to memcache server URI (eg. tcp://172.17.0.1:11211) to enable sccache memcached backend
208-212: Remove TODO comment or complete the taskThe TODO comment suggests joining code but doesn't specify what needs to be joined or why.
Either:
- Remove the TODO comment if it's no longer relevant
- Complete the task if it's still needed
- Add more context to explain what needs to be joined
218-225: Consider optimizing RocksDB build processThe RocksDB build process could be optimized:
- The cleanup step could be moved into the same RUN instruction to reduce layer size
- Consider using
make installinstead of manual file copyingApply this diff:
-RUN source /root/env && \ - make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ - mkdir -p /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib && \ - cp librocksdb.a /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/ && \ - cp -r include /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/ && \ - cd / && \ - rm -rf /tmp/rocksdb && \ - if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi +RUN source /root/env && \ + make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ + make install-static INSTALL_PATH=/opt/rocksdb/usr/local && \ + if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi && \ + rm -rf /tmp/rocksdb
247-250: Consider consolidating duplicate ARG declarationsThe same ARG declarations for sccache credentials are repeated across multiple build stages. While this is necessary for security, consider using a helper script to reduce duplication.
Create a new file
docker/configure-sccache-credentials.sh:#!/bin/bash # Configure sccache credentials echo "Configuring sccache credentials for stage: $1" for secret in ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY; do if [ -n "${!secret}" ]; then echo "Setting $secret" fi doneThen in the Dockerfile:
-# Configure credentials requied by sccache -ARG ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN -ARG AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY +COPY docker/configure-sccache-credentials.sh /usr/local/bin/ +ARG ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN +ARG AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY +RUN /usr/local/bin/configure-sccache-credentials.sh "current-stage"Also applies to: 272-275, 298-301, 351-354
378-384: Consider caching yarn packages more effectivelyThe current approach of copying unplugged packages back and forth could be optimized using Docker's cache mount feature.
Apply this diff:
- cp -R /tmp/unplugged /platform/.yarn/ && \ - yarn install --inline-builds && \ - cp -R /platform/.yarn/unplugged /tmp/ && \ + --mount=type=cache,target=/platform/.yarn/unplugged,sharing=locked \ + yarn install --inline-builds && \ export SKIP_GRPC_PROTO_BUILD=1 && \ yarn build && \
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/actions/rust/action.yaml(1 hunks)Dockerfile(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/actions/rust/action.yaml (2)
Line range hint 8-10: LGTM: Explicit default target improves clarity
Setting an explicit default target of x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu is a good practice as it:
- Makes the expected build target clear
- Reduces potential errors from undefined targets
- Aligns with common CI environments
88-90: Verify sccache version consistency across the codebase
The sccache version has been updated to v0.8.2, and the comment indicates it must match the Dockerfile. Let's verify this consistency.
Dockerfile (4)
8-11: LGTM: Clear documentation of build stages
The documentation clearly explains the purpose and relationship between build stages, including the new rocksdb stage.
154-194: Well-structured sccache configuration with proper secret handling
The configuration script:
- Properly handles different caching backends (GHA, S3, memcached)
- Correctly avoids exposing secrets in the environment file
- Includes proper error handling with shell options
228-233: LGTM: Proper environment variable configuration for RocksDB
The environment variables are correctly set to make RocksDB discoverable by the build system.
339-340: LGTM: Proper artifact handling and build statistics
The build artifacts are correctly copied to the /artifacts directory and sccache statistics are displayed for monitoring cache effectiveness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
Dockerfile (8)
106-108: Consider using a more descriptive filename for the environment fileThe generic name
/root/envmight be confusing. Consider using a more descriptive name like/root/build-envor/root/sccache-env.
137-138: Add explanation comment for disabling incremental buildsWhile disabling incremental builds is correct for sccache compatibility, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining why this is necessary.
-RUN echo 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=false' >> /root/env +RUN echo '# Disable incremental builds as they are not compatible with sccache' >> /root/env && \ + echo 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=false' >> /root/env
159-194: Consider extracting sccache configuration to a separate scriptThe current inline shell script is quite long and complex. Consider moving it to a separate shell script for better maintainability.
+COPY scripts/configure-sccache.sh /usr/local/bin/ +RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/configure-sccache.sh && \ + /usr/local/bin/configure-sccache.sh -RUN <<EOS - set -ex -o pipefail - # ... existing configuration ... -EOS
211-211: Remove TODO comment or provide more contextThe TODO comment lacks context about what needs to be joined. Either remove it or provide more specific information about what needs to be done.
216-225: Consider splitting RocksDB build stepsThe current RUN command combines multiple operations. Consider splitting it into logical steps for better cacheability and readability.
-RUN git clone https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git -b v8.10.2 --depth 1 . && \ - source /root/env && \ - PORTABLE=1 make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ - mkdir -p /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib && \ - strip librocksdb.a && \ - cp librocksdb.a /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/ && \ - cp -r include /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/ && \ - cd / && \ - rm -rf /tmp/rocksdb && \ - if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi +# Clone RocksDB +RUN git clone https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git -b v8.10.2 --depth 1 . + +# Build static library +RUN source /root/env && \ + PORTABLE=1 make -j$(nproc) static_lib + +# Install library and headers +RUN mkdir -p /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib && \ + strip librocksdb.a && \ + cp librocksdb.a /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/ && \ + cp -r include /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/ + +# Cleanup and show cache stats +RUN cd / && \ + rm -rf /tmp/rocksdb && \ + if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi
228-233: Use consistent environment variable export styleThe RocksDB environment variables are added with
exportwhile others in the file don't use it. Consider using a consistent style throughout the file.-echo "export ROCKSDB_STATIC=/opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/librocksdb.a" >> /root/env -echo "export ROCKSDB_LIB_DIR=/opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib" >> /root/env -echo "export ROCKSDB_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/rocksdb/usr/local/include" >> /root/env +echo "ROCKSDB_STATIC=/opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/librocksdb.a" >> /root/env +echo "ROCKSDB_LIB_DIR=/opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib" >> /root/env +echo "ROCKSDB_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/rocksdb/usr/local/include" >> /root/env
265-265: Pin cargo-chef version in a variableThe cargo-chef version is hardcoded. Consider moving it to a build argument for easier updates.
+ARG CARGO_CHEF_VERSION=0.1.67 - cargo install --profile "$CARGO_BUILD_PROFILE" [email protected] [email protected] --locked + cargo install --profile "$CARGO_BUILD_PROFILE" [email protected] cargo-chef@${CARGO_CHEF_VERSION} --locked
272-274: Consolidate duplicate ARG declarationsThe same ARGs for sccache credentials are repeated in multiple build stages. Consider using a base stage for common ARGs.
Create a base stage for common ARGs:
+FROM scratch AS arg-base +ARG ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN +ARG AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY + FROM deps AS build-planner -ARG ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN -ARG AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY +FROM arg-base AS build-plannerAlso applies to: 298-300, 351-353
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Dockerfile(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
339-340: Add verification for successful binary copy
The build process should verify that the binary was successfully copied to the artifacts directory.
- cp /platform/target/${OUT_DIRECTORY}/drive-abci /artifacts/ && \
- if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi
+ cp /platform/target/${OUT_DIRECTORY}/drive-abci /artifacts/ && \
+ if [ ! -x /artifacts/drive-abci ]; then
+ echo "Failed to copy drive-abci binary"
+ exit 1
+ fi && \
+ if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi378-384: Add error handling for yarn commands
The yarn commands should include error handling and verification of successful completion.
source /root/env && \
- cp -R /tmp/unplugged /platform/.yarn/ && \
- yarn install --inline-builds && \
- cp -R /platform/.yarn/unplugged /tmp/ && \
- export SKIP_GRPC_PROTO_BUILD=1 && \
- yarn build && \
+ cp -R /tmp/unplugged /platform/.yarn/ || exit 1 && \
+ yarn install --inline-builds || exit 1 && \
+ cp -R /platform/.yarn/unplugged /tmp/ || exit 1 && \
+ export SKIP_GRPC_PROTO_BUILD=1 && \
+ yarn build || exit 1 && \
if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Dockerfile (3)
106-108: Consider using heredoc for environment file initializationInstead of creating an empty file, consider using a heredoc to initialize with common variables or a header comment.
-RUN touch /root/env +RUN <<-'EOT' > /root/env +# Environment variables for build configuration +# Note: Sensitive variables like tokens and keys are passed separately +EOT
212-212: Address TODO comment about joining commandsThe TODO comment suggests joining commands, which should be addressed to maintain clean Dockerfile practices.
Would you like me to help implement the suggested command joining?
217-226: Enhance RocksDB build configurationThe RocksDB build could benefit from more explicit configuration and optimization flags.
RUN git clone https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git -b v8.10.2 --depth 1 . && \ source /root/env && \ - PORTABLE=1 make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ + PORTABLE=1 \ + EXTRA_CXXFLAGS="-DNDEBUG -O3" \ + USE_RTTI=1 \ + make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ mkdir -p /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib && \ strip librocksdb.a && \
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
213-222: Optimize RocksDB build configurationThe RocksDB build configuration could be optimized for better performance.
Consider adding these optimizations:
- PORTABLE=1 make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ + PORTABLE=1 USE_RTTI=1 EXTRA_CXXFLAGS="-fPIC -DNDEBUG" make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \This change:
- Enables RTTI for better C++ exception handling
- Adds position-independent code flag
- Defines NDEBUG for release builds
341-342: Add build artifact verificationAfter copying the build artifact, verify its integrity and dependencies.
Add these verification steps:
cp /platform/target/${OUT_DIRECTORY}/drive-abci /artifacts/ && \ + sha256sum /artifacts/drive-abci > /artifacts/drive-abci.sha256 && \ + ldd /artifacts/drive-abci | grep "not found" || true && \ if [[ -x /usr/bin/sccache ]]; then sccache --show-stats; fi
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Dockerfile(8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Dockerfile (4)
8-9: LGTM: New compilation dependencies stage
The introduction of deps-compilation as an intermediate stage is a good practice. It helps overcome Docker's limitation with interpolation in COPY --from statements and provides a clear separation of build dependencies.
Also applies to: 197-200
107-109: Good practice: Centralized environment variable management
The implementation of a centralized /root/env file for managing environment variables is a good practice. It provides:
- Single source of truth for environment variables
- Consistent environment across build stages
- Better maintainability
Also applies to: 227-230, 233-237
160-195: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in sccache configuration
The sccache configuration script should validate required environment variables before using them.
Apply this diff to add validation:
RUN <<EOS
set -ex -o pipefail
+ validate_env() {
+ local var_name="$1"
+ if [ -z "${!var_name}" ]; then
+ echo "Error: $var_name is required"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+ }
if [ -n "${SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED}" ]; then
+ validate_env "ACTIONS_CACHE_URL"
# Github Actions cache
echo "SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED=${SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED}" >> /root/env
echo "ACTIONS_CACHE_URL=${ACTIONS_CACHE_URL}" >> /root/env
# ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN is a secret so we don't put it in the env file
elif [ -n "${SCCACHE_BUCKET}" ]; then
# AWS S3
+ validate_env "AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"
+ validate_env "AWS_REGION"
if [ -z "${SCCACHE_REGION}" ] ; thenLikely invalid or redundant comment.
138-139: Verify the impact of disabling incremental builds
While disabling incremental builds is necessary for sccache compatibility, it might impact build times in development environments.
✅ Verification successful
Disabling incremental builds confirmed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any build-time optimizations in cargo config
rg -l "incremental\s*=\s*true" .cargo/
Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL' in all configuration files and environment setup scripts
rg -i 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL\s*=\s*(true|false)' .
Length of output: 109
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
116-204: Enhance error handling in sccache configurationThe sccache configuration script should validate required environment variables before using them to prevent silent failures.
Apply this diff to add validation:
RUN <<EOS set -ex -o pipefail + validate_vars() { + local backend=\$1 + shift + for var in "\$@"; do + if [ -z "\${!var}" ]; then + echo "Error: \$var is required for \$backend backend" >&2 + exit 1 + fi + done + } if [ -n "${SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED}" ]; then + validate_vars "GitHub Actions" "ACTIONS_CACHE_URL" # Github Actions cache echo "export SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED=${SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED}" >> /etc/profile echo "export ACTIONS_CACHE_URL=${ACTIONS_CACHE_URL}" >> /etc/profile elif [ -n "${SCCACHE_BUCKET}" ]; then + validate_vars "AWS S3" "AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID" "AWS_REGION" # AWS S3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/actions/rust/action.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(4 hunks)Dockerfile(10 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/actions/rust/action.yaml
- .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Dockerfile (3)
8-9: LGTM: Clear documentation of build stages
The added documentation clearly explains the purpose of the new deps-compilation stage and its relationship with other stages.
205-208: LGTM: Clean intermediate stage implementation
The deps-compilation stage is correctly implemented as an empty intermediate stage to overcome Docker's limitation with interpolation in COPY --from commands.
257-258: LGTM: Improved build process with sccache statistics
The addition of sccache statistics output after builds is helpful for monitoring cache effectiveness.
Also applies to: 322-323
This reverts commit 54792fd.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Dockerfile (3)
218-226: Add verification step for RocksDB buildThe RocksDB build process should verify the compiled library.
Add verification after the build:
RUN git clone https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git -b v8.10.2 --depth 1 . && \ source /root/env && \ PORTABLE=1 make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ + # Verify the static library was built correctly + nm librocksdb.a | grep -q "T _ZN7rocksdb2DB4OpenE" && \ mkdir -p /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib && \ cp librocksdb.a /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/lib/ && \ cp -r include /opt/rocksdb/usr/local/ && \
259-260: Consider using a variable for wasm-bindgen-cli versionThe wasm-bindgen-cli version is hardcoded. Consider using an ARG to make it configurable.
Add at the top of the Dockerfile:
+ARG WASM_BINDGEN_VERSION=0.2.86 +ARG CARGO_CHEF_VERSION=0.1.67 # Later in the file: - cargo install --profile "$CARGO_BUILD_PROFILE" [email protected] [email protected] --locked && \ + cargo install --profile "$CARGO_BUILD_PROFILE" \ + wasm-bindgen-cli@${WASM_BINDGEN_VERSION} \ + cargo-chef@${CARGO_CHEF_VERSION} \ + --locked && \
213-227: Consider adding build-time optimizations for RocksDBThe RocksDB build could benefit from additional optimizations.
Add optimization flags:
RUN git clone https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git -b v8.10.2 --depth 1 . && \ source /root/env && \ - PORTABLE=1 make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \ + PORTABLE=1 EXTRA_CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=x86-64" make -j$(nproc) static_lib && \
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Dockerfile(10 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Dockerfile (5)
69-74: LGTM: Proper configuration of Snappy dependencies
The environment variables for Snappy are correctly set and exported, which is essential for RocksDB compilation.
143-144: Good practice: Disabling incremental builds for sccache compatibility
Disabling incremental builds is necessary as sccache doesn't support them. This prevents potential cache inconsistencies.
229-234: LGTM: Proper configuration of RocksDB environment variables
The RocksDB environment variables are correctly set and exported, which is essential for downstream builds.
200-204: Good security practice: Handling secrets using ONBUILD
Using ONBUILD for secrets prevents them from being stored in intermediate layers.
205-208: LGTM: Clean separation of compilation dependencies
The deps-compilation stage provides a clean way to handle compilation dependencies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
.github/workflows/tests-packges-functional.yml (1)
Line range hint
13-13: Consider parameterizing the ECR host regionSince the PR objectives mention refactoring variable passing, consider using the new
aws_regioninput parameter here instead of directly accessing the secret.- ECR_HOST: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCOUNT_ID }}.dkr.ecr.${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }}.amazonaws.com + ECR_HOST: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCOUNT_ID }}.dkr.ecr.${{ inputs.aws_region }}.amazonaws.com.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (4)
Line range hint
15-22: Consider parameterizing the S3 bucket nameThe S3 bucket name is hardcoded. Consider moving it to a repository secret or environment variable for better maintainability.
- bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c + bucket: ${{ secrets.CACHE_BUCKET_NAME }}
Line range hint
16-16: Evaluate dependency on custom actions-cache forkUsing a custom fork (
strophy/actions-cache) could pose maintenance risks. Consider:
- Contributing the changes back to the upstream repository
- Using GitHub's native artifacts feature as suggested in the TODO comment
Line range hint
54-58: Align SCCACHE bucket configuration with cache configurationThe SCCACHE bucket name is also hardcoded. This should be aligned with the earlier cache configuration for consistency.
- SCCACHE_BUCKET: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c + SCCACHE_BUCKET: ${{ secrets.CACHE_BUCKET_NAME }}
Line range hint
61-73: Consider using .gitignore templatesInstead of manually managing .gitignore entries, consider:
- Using a base .gitignore template
- Maintaining these patterns in a separate config file
- Using .gitignore patterns specific to your build process
- - name: Ignore only already cached artifacts - run: | - find . -name '.gitignore' -exec rm -f {} + - echo ".yarn" >> .gitignore - echo "target" >> .gitignore - echo "node_modules" >> .gitignore - echo ".nyc_output" >> .gitignore - echo ".idea" >> .gitignore - echo ".ultra.cache.json" >> .gitignore - echo "db/*" >> .gitignore + - name: Configure build artifacts ignore patterns + run: | + cp .github/workflows/templates/build-artifacts.gitignore .gitignore.github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml (2)
Line range hint
99-112: Well-implemented caching strategy for test optimizationThe caching implementation effectively optimizes test execution by:
- Using fingerprint-based cache keys for proper invalidation
- Conditionally restoring volumes based on cache availability
- Leveraging OpenDAL for improved cache storage handling
Consider documenting the caching strategy in the repository's documentation to help other contributors understand the performance optimizations.
Line range hint
114-129: Consider conditional debug mode activationWhile having DEBUG=1 is helpful during development, it might impact test execution performance. Consider making it conditional based on workflow inputs or environment.
run: yarn workspace dashmate run mocha ${{ inputs.test-pattern }} env: - DEBUG: 1 + DEBUG: ${{ inputs.debug || '0' }} DASHMATE_E2E_TESTS_SKIP_IMAGE_BUILD: true DASHMATE_E2E_TESTS_LOCAL_HOMEDIR: /home/ubuntu/.dashmate
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-packges-functional.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(5 hunks).github/workflows/tests-test-suite.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/tests-packges-functional.yml (3)
Line range hint 35-36: Verify local network compatibility
The local network setup uses images from ECR. Ensure these images are multi-architecture or have x86_64 variants available.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Docker image architecture support
# Look for platform specifications in local network setup
fd 'docker-compose|Dockerfile' .github/actions/local-network --exec grep -l 'platform|TARGETARCH|BUILDARCH' {} \;
# Check for architecture-specific tags or references
rg -l 'arm64|amd64|x86_64' .github/actions/local-network7-8: Verify architecture compatibility with the new runner
The change from a self-hosted ARM64 runner to GitHub-hosted x86_64 (ubuntu-24.04) is significant. This architectural shift could impact:
- Docker image compatibility
- Binary dependencies
- Build performance
Let's verify the architecture dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Architecture compatibility verified with the new runner
The changes do not introduce architecture-specific dependencies or configurations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for architecture-specific configurations and dependencies
# Search for architecture-specific Docker configurations
rg -l 'arm64|aarch64'
# Check Dockerfile for platform-specific build args or stages
fd Dockerfile --exec grep -l 'platform|TARGETARCH|BUILDARCH' {} \;
# Look for binary dependencies that might be architecture-sensitive
rg -l 'lib.*\.so|\.dll|\.dylib'
Length of output: 1174
Line range hint 11-12: Verify browser availability on ubuntu-24.04
The workflow depends on Brave browser (CHROME_BIN: /usr/bin/brave-browser). Ensure this dependency is available on the new ubuntu-24.04 runner.
.github/workflows/tests-test-suite.yml (2)
61-62: LGTM!
The environment variables indentation change improves readability while maintaining functionality.
25-26: Verify compatibility with x86_64 architecture
The change from a self-hosted ARM64 runner to GitHub-hosted x86_64 runner (ubuntu-24.04) is a significant architectural shift. While this aligns with the PR's goal of prebuilding librocksdb, we should ensure compatibility.
Consider:
- Documenting the rationale for moving away from ARM64
- Adding architecture-specific test jobs if both architectures need to be supported
- Verifying that all native dependencies (especially RocksDB) work correctly on x86_64
✅ Verification successful
Architecture change from ARM64 to x86_64 is safe
The codebase has proper multi-architecture support with architecture-specific binary downloads and build paths. The Dockerfile and build system handle architecture differences appropriately.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for architecture-specific code or dependencies
# Look for:
# 1. Architecture-specific build flags
# 2. Native library dependencies
# 3. Docker image architecture specifications
# Check Dockerfile for architecture-specific settings
rg -i "arch|arm64|aarch64"
# Check for architecture-specific build flags in build scripts
fd -e sh -e bash -e dockerfile --exec grep -i "arch|arm64|aarch64" {}
Length of output: 236165
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (1)
7-8: Verify architecture compatibility after runner migration
The switch from a self-hosted ARM64 runner to GitHub-hosted x86_64 (ubuntu-24.04) could impact architecture-dependent builds.
✅ Verification successful
Architecture compatibility verified after runner migration
No architecture-specific dependencies or build configurations were found that would impact the switch to GitHub-hosted x86_64 runners.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for architecture-specific code or dependencies
# Search for architecture-specific dependencies in package.json files
echo "Checking for architecture-specific dependencies:"
fd package.json --exec jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[]' {} \; | sort -u | rg -i 'arm|x86|64|32|arch'
# Search for architecture-specific build scripts
echo "Checking for architecture-specific build configurations:"
rg -i 'arch|platform|arm|x86|64|32' -g 'package.json' -g '*.yml' -g '*.yaml' -g 'Makefile'
Length of output: 25390
.github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml (1)
Line range hint 72-97: LGTM! Docker image handling follows best practices
The implementation:
- Uses explicit versioning with SHA tags
- Properly handles registry authentication
- Maintains clear image tagging strategy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
20-20: Consider enhancing AWS region documentationWhile the AWS-related build args are documented, consider adding a note about the relationship between
AWS_REGIONandSCCACHE_REGION, and their default behavior.
155-204: LGTM with suggestions for AWS configurationThe sccache configuration improvements are good, particularly:
- Secure handling of AWS credentials
- Proper SSL configuration
- Clear separation of configuration sources
Consider adding a check for
AWS_REGIONwhenSCCACHE_REGIONis not set to prevent potential issues.if [ -z "${SCCACHE_REGION}" ] ; then + if [ -z "${AWS_REGION}" ] ; then + echo "Error: Either SCCACHE_REGION or AWS_REGION must be set" >&2 + exit 1 + fi # Default to AWS_REGION if not set export SCCACHE_REGION=${AWS_REGION} fi
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(4 hunks)Dockerfile(10 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
Dockerfile (1)
Learnt from: lklimek
PR: dashpay/platform#2318
File: Dockerfile:160-198
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T10:31:31.084Z
Learning: In the `Dockerfile` for the rs-drive-abci project, when configuring sccache, we do not need to add validation checks for configuration variables, as sccache performs validation at runtime.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Dockerfile (5)
8-9: LGTM: Clear and accurate documentation update
The added documentation clearly explains the purpose of the deps-compilation stage and its relationship with deps-base and deps-sccache.
69-74: LGTM: Proper Snappy static library configuration
The environment variables for Snappy are correctly configured for static linking, which is required for RocksDB compilation.
205-208: LGTM: Efficient compilation dependencies handling
The empty intermediate stage is a clever way to handle the conditional base image selection while maintaining a clean build hierarchy.
261-261: LGTM: Consistent environment handling
The build process updates consistently source the environment configuration and add helpful sccache statistics output for debugging.
Also applies to: 280-280, 305-305, 323-323, 354-354, 371-371
213-243: LGTM: Well-implemented RocksDB build process
The RocksDB build process is well-implemented with:
- Architecture-specific optimizations (
haswellfor amd64) - Proper static library handling
- Correct environment variable configuration
Let's verify the RocksDB version compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
RocksDB version is consistently specified as 8.10.2
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify RocksDB version compatibility
# Check if the version matches across all files
rg -l "rocksdb.*8.10.2"
Length of output: 36
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
When building Docker image, we can compile librocksdb as part of the dep stage, and reuse it later, utilizing docker layer caches to avoid additional compilation.
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
Pushed and monitored GHA progress
Breaking Changes
None
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
aws_regionfor enhanced AWS integration in Docker workflows.Improvements
sccacheand clarifying target platform settings.Bug Fixes
Workflow Updates