-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
reinstein_bibtex.bib
9816 lines (8964 loc) · 502 KB
/
reinstein_bibtex.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
@article{abramowiczInformationMarketsAdministrative2004,
ids = {Abramowicz2004,Abramowicz2004a},
title = {Information Markets, Administrative Decisionmaking, and Predictive Cost-Benefit Analysis},
author = {Abramowicz, Michael},
year = {2004},
journal = {The University of Chicago Law Review},
pages = {933--1020},
publisher = {{JSTOR}},
abstract = {FutureMAP, a project of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, was to involve experiments to determine whether information markets could improve Defense Department decisionmaking. Information markets are securities markets used to derive information from the prices of securities whose liquidation values are contingent on future events. The government intended to use such a market to assess the probabilities of potential political assassinations, and the indelicacy of this potential application contributed to a controversy leading to the cancellation of the program. In this Article, Professor Abramowicz assesses whether information markets in theory could be useful to administrative agencies, and it concludes that information markets could help discipline administrative agency predictions, but only if a number of technical hurdles such as the danger of manipulation can be overcome. Because the predictions of well-functioning information markets are objective, they function as a tool that exhibits many of the same virtues in predictive tasks that cost- benefit analysis offers for normative policy evaluation. Both approaches can help to overcome cognitive errors, thwart interest group manipulation, and discipline administrative agency decisionmaking. The Article suggests that the two forms of analysis might be combined to produce a ``predictive cost-benefit analysis.'' In such an analysis, an information market would predict the outcome of a retrospective cost- benefit analysis, to be conducted some years after the decision whether to enact a particular policy. As long as the identity of the eventual decisionmaker cannot be anticipated, predictive cost-benefit analysis estimates how an average decisionmaker would be expected to evaluate the policy. Because the predictive cost-benefit analysis assessment is not dependent on the identity of current agency officials, they cannot shade the numbers to justify policies that the officials prefer for idiosyncratic or ideological reasons.}
}
@article{adamsPuttingTomorrowWhat2011,
ids = {Adams2011,Adams2011a},
title = {Putting off Tomorrow to Do What You Want Today: Planning for Retirement.},
author = {Adams, Gary A and Rau, Barbara L},
year = {2011},
journal = {American Psychologist},
volume = {66},
number = {3},
pages = {180},
publisher = {{American Psychological Association}},
keywords = {retirement}
}
@article{adenaGivingOnceGiving2019,
ids = {Adena2019},
title = {Giving Once, Giving Twice: A Two-Period Field Experiment on Intertemporal Crowding in Charitable Giving},
author = {Adena, Maja and Huck, Steffen},
year = {2019},
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
volume = {172},
issn = {00472727},
doi = {10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.01.002},
abstract = {We study intertemporal crowding between two fundraising campaigns for the same charitable organization by manipulating donors' beliefs about the likelihood of future campaigns in two subsequent field experiments. The data shows that initial giving is decreasing in the likelihood of a future campaign while subsequent giving increases in initial giving. While this refutes the predictions of a simple expected utility model, the pattern is in line with a model that allows for (anticipated or unanticipated) habit formation provided that donations in the two periods are substitutes.}
}
@article{advisoryHighNetWorth2017,
ids = {Advisory2017},
title = {High {{Net Worth Individuals}} Philanthropy Trends {{A}} Comparative Study of {{France}} and the {{Netherlands}}},
author = {Advisory, Philanthropy},
year = {2017}
}
@article{agranovIncentivesCompensationSchemes2013,
ids = {Agranov2013,Agranov2013a},
title = {Incentives and Compensation Schemes: An Experimental Study},
author = {Agranov, Marina and Tergiman, Chloe},
year = {2013},
journal = {International Journal of Industrial Organization},
volume = {31},
number = {3},
pages = {238--247},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
keywords = {incentives,real effort,tournaments,within-subject},
note = {NULL
\par
NULL
\par
NULL}
}
@article{ahnComingGoingExperiments2009,
title = {Coming and Going: Experiments on Endogenous Group Sizes for Excludable Public Goods},
author = {Ahn, T K and Isaac, R M and Salmon, T C},
year = {2009},
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
volume = {93},
number = {1-2},
pages = {336--351},
issn = {0047-2727}
}
@article{ahnHeterogeneousPreferencesCollective2003,
ids = {Ahn2003,Ahn2003a},
title = {Heterogeneous Preferences and Collective Action},
author = {Ahn, T K and Ostrom, E and Walker, J M},
year = {2003},
journal = {Public Choice},
volume = {117},
number = {3},
pages = {295--314},
publisher = {{Springer}}
}
@article{aimoneEndogenousGroupFormation2010,
ids = {Aimone2010,Aimone2010a},
title = {Endogenous {{Group Formation}} via {{Unproductive Costs}}},
author = {Aimone, J and Iannaccone, L R and Makowsky, M D and Rubin, J},
year = {2010},
journal = {Working Papers},
publisher = {{Towson University, Department of Economics}}
}
@article{alaouiValueUselessInformation2010,
ids = {Alaoui2010,Alaoui2010b},
title = {The Value of Useless Information.},
author = {Alaoui, L},
year = {2010},
journal = {Working Paper},
keywords = {behavioral,loss of face,theoretical}
}
@article{albertiThresholdPublicGood2011,
ids = {Alberti2011},
title = {Threshold Public Good Games and Impulse Balance Theory},
author = {Alberti, Federica and Cartwright, Edward and Cartwright, Edward},
year = {2011},
number = {December 2013}
}
@article{albrechtEquilibriumDirectedSearch2006,
ids = {Albrecht2006,Albrecht2006a},
title = {Equilibrium Directed Search with Multiple Applications},
author = {Albrecht, J and Gautier, P A and Vroman, S},
year = {2006},
journal = {Review of Economic Studies},
volume = {73},
number = {4},
pages = {869--891},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}}
}
@book{alDoingMetaAnalysis,
ids = {Harreretal},
title = {Doing {{Meta}}-{{Analysis}} in {{R}}},
author = {et {al}, Harrer}
}
@article{alecstephensonQuickIntroductionShiny2013,
ids = {AlecStephenson2013},
title = {A {{Quick Introduction}} to {{R Shiny}}},
author = {{Alec Stephenson}},
year = {2013},
pages = {1--7}
}
@article{allenShortrunImpactUsing2013,
ids = {Allen2013,Allen2013a},
title = {The Short-Run Impact of Using Lotteries for School Admissions: Early Results from {{Brighton}} and {{Hove}}'s Reforms},
author = {Allen, Rebecca and Burgess, Simon and McKenna, Leigh},
year = {2013},
journal = {Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers},
volume = {38},
number = {1},
pages = {149--166},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}},
keywords = {education,labor,nleduc,uk}
}
@book{allisonMissingData2002,
title = {Missing Data},
author = {Allison, Paul David},
year = {2002},
publisher = {{SAGE}},
address = {{Thousand Oaks, Calif.; London}},
abstract = {Using numerous examples and practical tips, this book offers a non-technical explanation of the standard methods for missing data (such as listwise or casewise deletion) as well as two newer methods, maximum likelihood and multiple imputation},
isbn = {978-1-4129-8507-9},
langid = {english},
annotation = {OCLC: 896870843}
}
@article{alpizarAnonymityReciprocityConformity2008,
ids = {Alpizar2008,Alpizar2008a,alpizar2008anonymity},
title = {Anonymity, Reciprocity, and Conformity: Evidence from Voluntary Contributions to a National Park in {{Costa Rica}}},
author = {Alpizar, F and Carlsson, F and {Johansson-Stenman}, O},
year = {2008},
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
volume = {92},
number = {5-6},
pages = {1047--1060},
publisher = {{Elsevier}}
}
@article{andersonAssortativeMatchingReputation2001,
ids = {Anderson2001,Anderson2001a},
title = {Assortative {{Matching}}, {{Reputation}}, and the {{Beatles Breakup}}},
author = {Anderson, A and Smith, L},
year = {2001},
publisher = {{U of Michigan Working Paper}}
}
@article{andersonEconomicPerspectivesChildhood2003,
ids = {Anderson2003,Anderson2003b},
title = {Economic {{Perspectives}} on {{Childhood Obesity}}.},
author = {Anderson, P M and Butcher, K F and Levine, P B},
year = {2003},
journal = {Economic Perspectives},
volume = {27},
number = {3},
pages = {30--49},
publisher = {{Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago}}
}
@article{andersonw.thomasjr.SociallyConsciousConsumer1972,
ids = {AndersonW.ThomasJr.1972,AndersonW.ThomasJr.1972a},
title = {The {{Socially Conscious Consumer}}},
author = {{Anderson W. Thomas Jr.} and {Cunningham William H.}},
year = {1972},
month = jul,
journal = {Journal of Marketing},
volume = {36},
number = {3},
pages = {23--31},
publisher = {{American Marketing Association}},
issn = {0022-2429},
abstract = {Who are the socially conscious consumers? This article typologically classifies socially conscious consumers and evaluates the relative sensitivity of demographic and sociopsychological variables in discriminating degree of social consciousness.}
}
@article{andoLifeCycleHypothesis1963,
ids = {Ando1963,Ando1963a},
title = {The" Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests},
author = {Ando, Albert and Modigliani, Franco},
year = {1963},
journal = {The American Economic Review},
pages = {55--84},
publisher = {{JSTOR}},
keywords = {retirement consulting}
}
@article{andreoniAvoidingAskField2017,
ids = {andreoni2017avoiding},
title = {Avoiding the Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving},
author = {Andreoni, James and Rao, Justin M and Trachtman, Hannah},
year = {2017},
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
volume = {125},
number = {3},
pages = {625--653},
publisher = {{University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL}}
}
@article{andreoniCharitableGivingMarried2003,
ids = {Andreoni2003b,Andreoni2003e},
title = {Charitable {{Giving}} by {{Married Couples}}: Who {{Decides}} and {{Why Does It Matter}}?},
author = {Andreoni, James and Brown, Eleanor and Rischall, Isaac},
year = {2003},
journal = {The Journal of Human Resources},
volume = {38},
number = {1},
pages = {111--133},
publisher = {{University of Wisconsin Press}},
issn = {0022-166X},
abstract = {We examine how charitable giving is influenced by who in the household is primarily responsible for giving decisions. Looking first at single-person households, we find men and women to have significantly different tastes for giving, setting up a potential conflict for married couples. We find that, with respect to total giving, married households tend to resolve these conflicts largely in favor of the husband's preferences. Bargaining over charitable giving, rather than letting one spouse take charge, is estimated to reduce giving by at least 6 percent. When the woman is the decisionmaker, she will still make a significantly different allocation of those charity dollars, preferring to give to more charities but to give less to each. Our results give new insights into both the demographics of charitable giving and the costliness of household bargaining.},
keywords = {gender,philanthropy,survey data}
}
@article{andreoniCooperationPublicGoodsExperiments1995,
ids = {Andreoni1995,Andreoni1995a},
title = {Cooperation in {{Public}}-{{Goods Experiments}}: Kindness or {{Confusion}}?},
author = {Andreoni, J},
year = {1995},
journal = {The American Economic Review},
volume = {85},
number = {4},
pages = {891--904},
publisher = {{JSTOR}},
keywords = {experimental,philanthropy,social,VCM}
}
@article{andreoniExperimentalTestPublicGoods1993,
ids = {Andreoni1993,Andreoni1993a},
title = {An {{Experimental Test}} of the {{Public}}-{{Goods Crowding}}-{{Out Hypothesis}}},
author = {Andreoni, James},
year = {1993},
month = dec,
journal = {The American Economic Review},
volume = {83},
number = {5},
pages = {1317--1327},
publisher = {{American Economic Association}},
issn = {0002-8282},
abstract = {This paper presents an experimental test of the proposition that government contributions to public goods, funded by lump-sum taxation, will completely crowd out voluntary contributions. It is found that crowding-out is incomplete and that subjects who are taxed are significantly more cooperative. This is true even though the tax does not affect the Nash equilibrium prediction. This result is taken as evidence for alternative models that assume people experience some private benefit from contributing to public goods.},
keywords = {C92,crowding-out,experimental,H41,philanthropy,VCM}
}
@article{andreoniGovernmentGrantsPrivate2003,
ids = {Andreoni2003,Andreoni2003c},
title = {Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd out Giving or Fund-Raising?},
author = {Andreoni, J and Payne, A A},
year = {2003},
journal = {American Economic Review},
pages = {792--812},
publisher = {{JSTOR}},
keywords = {crowding out,philanthropy,public economics}
}
@article{andreoniImpureAltruismDonations1990,
ids = {Andreoni1990,Andreoni1990a},
title = {Impure {{Altruism}} and {{Donations}} to {{Public Goods}}: A {{Theory}} of {{Warm}}-{{Glow Giving}}},
author = {Andreoni, James},
year = {1990},
journal = {The Economic Journal},
volume = {100},
pages = {464--477},
keywords = {philanthropy,theory}
}
@article{andreoniSocialImage502009,
ids = {andreoni2009social},
title = {Social Image and the 50\textendash 50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects},
author = {Andreoni, James and Bernheim, B Douglas},
year = {2009},
journal = {Econometrica},
volume = {77},
number = {5},
pages = {1607--1636},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}}
}
@article{angristSchoolingVietnamEraGl2011,
ids = {Angrist2011,Angrist2011a},
title = {Schooling and the {{Vietnam}}-{{Era Gl Bill}}: Evidence from the {{Draft Lottery}}},
author = {Angrist, Joshua D and Chen, Stacey H},
year = {2011},
journal = {American Economic Journal: Applied Economics},
pages = {96--118},
publisher = {{JSTOR}},
abstract = {Draft-lottery estimates of the causal effects of Vietnam-era military service using 2000 census data show marked schooling gains for veterans. We argue that these gains can be attributed to Vietnam veterans' use of the GI Bill rather than draft avoidance behavior At the same time, draft lottery estimates of the earnings consequences of Vietnam-era service are close to zero in 2000. The earnings and schooling results can be reconciled by a flattening of the ageearnings profile in middle age and a modest economic return to the schooling subsidized by the GI Bill. Other long-run consequences of Vietnam-era service include increases in migration and public sector employment.},
keywords = {nled}
}
@article{anikFeelingGoodGiving2009,
ids = {anik2009feeling},
title = {Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior},
author = {Anik, Lalin and Aknin, Lara and Norton, Michael and Dunn, Elizabeth},
year = {2009}
}
@article{anikNortonHappinessMatchmaking2011,
ids = {Anik2011,Anik2011a},
title = {Norton.``{{The Happiness}} of {{Matchmaking}}.''},
author = {Anik, Lalin and Michael, I},
year = {2011},
journal = {Unpublished manuscript}
}
@article{arbakCanWagesSignal2005,
ids = {Arbak2005,Arbak2005a},
title = {Can {{Wages Signal Kindness}}?},
author = {Arbak, Emrah and Kranich, Laurence and {Others}},
year = {2005}
}
@unpublished{armantierPresentationEconomicScience2012,
ids = {Armantier2012,Armantier2012a},
title = {Presentation at the {{Economic Science Association Conference}}.},
author = {Armantier, Olivier},
year = {2012}
}
@article{arnoldSimulationMethodsEstimate2011,
ids = {Arnold2011},
title = {Simulation Methods to Estimate Design Power : An Overview for Applied Research},
author = {Arnold, Benjamin F and Hogan, Daniel R and Jr, John M Colford and Hubbard, Alan E},
year = {2011},
keywords = {computer simulation,power,research design,sample size}
}
@article{arnotEthicalConsumersCare2006,
ids = {Arnot2006,Arnot2006a},
title = {Do {{Ethical Consumers Care About Price}}? A {{Revealed Preference Analysis}} of {{Fair Trade Coffee Purchases}}},
author = {{Arnot}},
year = {2006},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie},
volume = {54},
number = {4},
pages = {555--565},
publisher = {{Blackwell Synergy}},
abstract = {The existing literature on socially responsible purchasing relies heavily on stated preference measures elicited through surveys that utilize hypothetical market choices. This paper explores consumers' revealed purchasing behavior with regard to fair trade coffee and is apparently the first to do so in an actual market setting. In a series of experiments, we investigated differences in consumer responsiveness to relative price changes in fair trade and non-fair trade brewed coffees. In order to minimize the hypothetical bias that may be present in some experimental settings, we conducted our experiments in cooperation with a vendor who allowed us to vary prices in an actual coffee shop. Using a choice model, we found that purchasers of fair trade coffee were much less price responsive than those of other coffee products. The demonstration of low sensitivity to price suggests that the market premiums identified by stated preference studies do indeed exist and are not merely artifacts of hypothetical settings.}
}
@article{arrowSocialResponsibilityEconomic1973,
ids = {Arrow1973,Arrow1973a},
title = {Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency},
author = {Arrow, K J},
year = {1973},
journal = {Public Policy},
volume = {21},
number = {3},
pages = {303--317}
}
@article{asfawRoleFoodPrice2006,
ids = {Asfaw2006,Asfaw2006a},
title = {The {{Role}} of {{Food Price Policy}} in {{Determining}} the {{Prevalence}} of {{Obesity}}: Evidence from {{Egypt}}},
author = {Asfaw, A},
year = {2006},
journal = {Review of Agricultural Economics},
volume = {28},
number = {3},
pages = {305--312},
publisher = {{Blackwell Synergy}},
keywords = {agriculture,development,empirical,food policy,obesity}
}
@article{atheyIdentificationInferenceNonlinear2006,
ids = {Athey2006,Athey2006a},
title = {Identification and {{Inference}} in {{Nonlinear Difference}}-in-{{Differences Models}}},
author = {Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W},
year = {2006},
journal = {Econometrica},
volume = {74},
number = {2},
pages = {431--497},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}},
abstract = {This paper develops a generalization of the widely used difference-in-differences method for evaluating the effects of policy changes. We propose a model that allows the control and treatment groups to have different average benefits from the treatment. The assumptions of the proposed model are invariant to the scaling of the outcome. We provide conditions under which the model is nonparametrically identified and propose an estimator that can be applied using either repeated cross section or panel data. Our approach provides an estimate of the entire counterfactual distribution of outcomes that would have been experienced by the treatment group in the absence of the treatment and likewise for the untreated group in the presence of the treatment. Thus, it enables the evaluation of policy interventions according to criteria such as a mean-variance trade-off. We also propose methods for inference, showing that our estimator for the average treatment effect is root-N consistent and asymptotically normal. We consider extensions to allow for covariates, discrete dependent variables, and multiple groups and time periods.}
}
@article{atheyMachineLearningMethods2019,
ids = {Athey2019},
title = {Machine {{Learning Methods Economists Should Know About}} | {{Stanford Graduate School}} of {{Business}}},
author = {Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W},
year = {2019},
journal = {Working Paper,},
number = {March},
abstract = {We discuss the relevance of the recent Machine Learning (ML) literature for eco- nomics and econometrics. First we discuss the differences in goals, methods and settings between the ML literature and the traditional econometrics and statistics literatures. Then we discuss some specific methods from the machine learning literature that we view as important for empirical researchers in economics. These include supervised learning methods for regression and classification, unsupervised learning methods, as well as matrix completion methods. Finally, we highlight newly developed methods at the intersection of ML and econometrics, methods that typically perform better than either off-the-shelf ML or more traditional econometric methods when applied to particular classes of problems, problems that include causal inference for average treat- ment effects, optimal policy estimation, and estimation of the counterfactual effect of price changes in consumer choice models.}
}
@article{atkinsonDesignTaxStructure1976,
ids = {Atkinson1976,Atkinson1976a},
title = {The Design of Tax Structure: Direct versus Indirect Taxation},
author = {Atkinson, Anthony Barnes and Stiglitz, Joseph E},
year = {1976},
journal = {Journal of public economics},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {55--75},
publisher = {{North-Holland}},
keywords = {poorcard}
}
@article{atkinsonGivingOverseasPublic2009,
ids = {Atkinson2009,Atkinson2009a},
title = {Giving Overseas and Public Policy},
author = {Atkinson, A B},
year = {2009},
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
volume = {93},
number = {5-6},
pages = {647--653},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
issn = {0047-2727}
}
@article{atkinsonMeasurementPoverty1987,
ids = {Atkinson1987,Atkinson1987a},
title = {On the {{Measurement}} of {{Poverty}}},
author = {Atkinson, A B},
year = {1987},
journal = {Econometrica},
volume = {55},
number = {4},
pages = {749--764},
publisher = {{The Econometric Society}},
issn = {00129682},
keywords = {development,measurement,theory}
}
@article{attribution-noncommercialQuantumMicroeconomics2009,
ids = {Attribution-noncommercial2009a},
title = {Quantum {{Microeconomics}}},
author = {{Attribution-noncommercial}, Creative Commons and License, Unported and Commons, Creative},
year = {2009},
number = {January}
}
@article{attribution-noncommercialQuantumMicroeconomicsCalculus2009,
ids = {Attribution-noncommercial2009},
title = {Quantum {{Microeconomics}} with {{Calculus}}},
author = {{Attribution-noncommercial}, Creative Commons and License, Unported and Commons, Creative},
year = {2009},
number = {January}
}
@article{autenCharitableContributionsIntergenerational1996,
ids = {Auten1996,Auten1996a},
title = {Charitable Contributions and Intergenerational Transfers},
author = {Auten, G and Joulfaian, D},
year = {1996},
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
volume = {59},
number = {1},
pages = {55--68},
publisher = {{Elsevier}}
}
@article{autenCharitableGivingIncome2002,
ids = {Auten2002,Auten2002a},
title = {Charitable {{Giving}}, {{Income}}, and {{Taxes}}: An {{Analysis}} of {{Panel Data}}},
author = {Auten, Gerald E and Sieg, Holger and Clotfelter, Charles T},
year = {2002},
month = mar,
journal = {The American Economic Review},
volume = {92},
number = {1},
pages = {371--382},
publisher = {{American Economic Association}},
issn = {0002-8282},
keywords = {panel data,philanthropy,price of giving,public finance,survey data,taxation}
}
@incollection{averyShouldFinancialAid2004,
ids = {Avery2004,Avery2004a},
title = {Do and Should Financial Aid Packages Affect Students' College Choices?},
booktitle = {College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It},
author = {Avery, Christopher and Hoxby, Caroline Minter},
year = {2004},
pages = {239--302},
publisher = {{University of Chicago Press}},
keywords = {education,nleduc}
}
@article{baadeWhatDeterminesAlumni1996,
ids = {Baade1996,Baade1996a},
title = {What Determines Alumni Generosity?},
author = {Baade, R A and Sundberg, J O},
year = {1996},
journal = {Economics of Education Review},
volume = {15},
number = {1},
pages = {75--81},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
doi = {10.1016/0272-7757(95)00026-7},
abstract = {Alumni giving is correlated with institutional characteristics, such as quality and development efforts, and student characteristics, such as quality and wealth. Empirical analysis is complicated by the expected correlation between institutional quality and student wealth, and the possible endogeneity between institutional expenditures on education (one common measure of quality) and the level of alumni support the institution receives. This paper uses a two-stage least squares approach with data on quality and variables correlated with student wealth to address these issues. Quality variables are found to have a positive impact on the average alumni gift, with that impact most significant for private universities and liberal arts colleges. Wealth variables also have a positive impact on the average gift, with the estimated coefficients most significant for public universities. Development effort is very important in determining the level of giving for all three types of institutions.},
keywords = {alumni,empirical,philanthropy,survey data}
}
@article{backusCharityHomogeneousGood2010,
ids = {Backus2010,Backus2010a},
title = {Is Charity a Homogeneous Good?},
author = {Backus, Peter},
year = {2010},
publisher = {{University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics}},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found}
}
@article{backusHowSensitiveAverage2018,
ids = {backus2018sensitive},
title = {How Sensitive Is the Average Taxpayer to Changes in the Tax-Price of Giving?},
author = {Backus, Peter G and Grant, Nicky L},
year = {2018},
journal = {International Tax and Public Finance},
pages = {1--40},
publisher = {{Springer}}
}
@inproceedings{backusSubstitutingDonkeysReligion2008,
ids = {Backus2008,Backus2008a},
title = {Substituting {{Donkeys}} for {{Religion}}?: Testing the {{Homogeneity}} of {{Philanthropy}}},
booktitle = {Paper Presented at {{NCVO}}-{{VSSN Conference}}},
author = {Backus, Peter},
year = {2008},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found}
}
@article{baCompetitiveModelPrice,
ids = {BA,BAa},
title = {A {{Competitive Model}} of {{Price Dispersion}} in {{Online Retailing}}},
author = {BA, S and STALLAERT, J A N and ZHANG, J},
doi = {10.2139/ssrn.965774},
keywords = {Industrial Organization,internet}
}
@incollection{baguesOnlineLaborMarket2009,
ids = {Bagues2009,Bagues2009a},
title = {Do {{Online Labor Market Intermediaries Matter}}? The {{Impact}} of Em {{AlmaLaurea}}/Em on the {{University}}-to-{{Work Transition}}},
booktitle = {Studies of Labor Market Intermediation},
author = {Bagues, Manuel F and Labini, Mauro Sylos},
year = {2009},
pages = {127--154},
publisher = {{University of Chicago Press}},
keywords = {Education-Employment transition,EEP,labor,Labor}
}
@article{bainjoeBarriersNewCompetition1956,
ids = {BainJoe1956,BainJoe1956a},
title = {Barriers to {{New Competition}}},
author = {Bain Joe, S},
year = {1956},
publisher = {{Cambridge, Harvard University Press}},
doi = {10.4159/harvard.9780674188037},
howpublished = {Harvard University Press},
keywords = {classic,competition,entry,Industrial Organization},
annotation = {Published: Harvard University Press}
}
@article{banerjeeRunningLeadershipEvidence2014,
ids = {Banerjee2014,Banerjee2014a},
title = {Running for {{Leadership}} : Evidence from an Artefactual Field Experiment in Matrilineal and Patriarchic Societies in {{India}}},
author = {Banerjee, Debosree and D, Marcela Ibanez and Riener, Gerhard and Wollni, Meike},
year = {2014},
pages = {1--28},
keywords = {gender,labor market,power,social exposure}
}
@article{banksEconomicCapabilitiesChoices2006,
ids = {Banks2006,Banks2006a},
title = {Economic {{Capabilities}}, {{Choices}} and {{Outcomes}} at {{Older Ages}}*},
author = {Banks, James},
year = {2006},
journal = {Fiscal Studies},
volume = {27},
number = {3},
pages = {281--311},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-8578.2006.00036.x},
keywords = {retirement consulting}
}
@article{banksUnderstandingPensionsCognitive2007,
ids = {Banks2007,Banks2007a},
title = {Understanding {{Pensions}}: Cognitive {{Function}}, {{Numerical Ability}} and {{Retirement Saving}}*},
author = {Banks, James and Oldfield, Zoe},
year = {2007},
journal = {Fiscal Studies},
volume = {28},
number = {2},
pages = {143--170},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}},
doi = {10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00052.x},
keywords = {retirement consulting}
}
@article{bardhanIrrigationCooperationEmpirical2000,
ids = {Bardhan2000,Bardhan2000a},
title = {Irrigation and Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of 48 Irrigation Communities in {{South India}}},
author = {Bardhan, P},
year = {2000},
journal = {Economic Development and Cultural Change},
volume = {48},
number = {4},
pages = {847--865},
publisher = {{UChicago Press}},
doi = {10.1086/452480}
}
@article{barriosOPTIMALSTRATIFICATIONRANDOMIZED2014,
ids = {Barrios2014,Barrios2014a,barriosOPTIMALSTRATIFICATIONRANDOMIZED2014a},
title = {{{OPTIMAL STRATIFICATION IN RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS}} 1 . {{I}} Ntroduction {{Experimenters}} Often Face the Following Situation : They Are Ready to Assign Treatment to Some Subset of Units in an Experimental Group , They Have a Rich Amount of Information about Each u},
author = {Barrios, Thomas},
year = {2014},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found}
}
@article{bartkeSocialComparisonNudges2017,
ids = {Bartke2017},
title = {Social Comparison Nudges\textemdash{{Guessing}} the Norm Increases Charitable Giving},
author = {Bartke, Simon and Friedl, Andreas and Gelhaar, Felix and Reh, Laura},
year = {2017},
journal = {Economics Letters},
volume = {152},
issn = {01651765},
doi = {10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.023},
abstract = {Social comparison nudges that employ descriptive norms were found to increase charitable giving. This paper finds that individuals who receive a descriptive norm donate significantly more when they have to guess the descriptive norm beforehand. We argue that guessing draws attention to the norm and therefore increases its effectiveness. Our results suggest that the effectiveness of nudges that use descriptive norms depends on how the a priori beliefs about the descriptive norm are updated.}
}
@article{bassiNoteCharitableGiving2017,
ids = {Bassi2017,bassiNoteCharitableGiving2017a},
title = {A Note on Charitable Giving by Corporates and Aristocrats: Evidence from a Field Experiment},
author = {Bassi, Vittorio and Huck, Steffen and Rasul, Imran},
year = {2017},
journal = {Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics},
volume = {66},
issn = {22148051},
doi = {10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.012},
abstract = {Multiple sources of funding are becoming increasingly important for charitable organizations. Donations from corporate donors for example account for 25\textendash 35\% of charitable income for the largest US charities, across charitable sectors. This note presents some tentative first evidence from a natural field experiment to shed light on how different types of potential donors: individuals, corporates and aristocratically titled individuals, respond to the same fundraising drive. Each donor type was randomly assigned to treatments varying in two dimensions: (i) whether information was conveyed about the existence of an anonymous lead donor, and (ii) how individual donations would be matched by the anonymous lead donor. We find that aristocrats are significantly more likely to respond and that corporates give significantly more than individuals. Treatment effects moreover suggest that (proportional) matching is to be avoided for corporate donors.}
}
@article{basuLabelPerformanceWillingness,
ids = {Basu,Basua},
title = {Label Performance and the Willingness to Pay for {{Fair Trade}} Coffee: A Cross-National Perspective},
author = {Basu, A K and Hicks, R L},
keywords = {❓ Multiple DOI}
}
@article{batorNewWaysPromote2000,
ids = {Bator2000,Bator2000a},
title = {New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements},
author = {Bator, Renee J and Cialdini, Robert B},
year = {2000},
journal = {Journal of Social Issues},
volume = {56},
number = {3},
pages = {527--541},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}},
doi = {10.1111/0022-4537.00182}
}
@article{battalioOptimizationIncentivesCoordination2001,
ids = {Battalio2001,Battalio2001a},
title = {Optimization {{Incentives}} and {{Coordination Failure}} in {{Laboratory Stag Hunt Games}}},
author = {Battalio, R and Samuelson, L and Van Huyck, J},
year = {2001},
journal = {Econometrica},
volume = {69},
number = {3},
pages = {749--764},
publisher = {{Blackwell Synergy}},
doi = {10.1111/1468-0262.00212},
abstract = {Compares 3 stag hunt games, in each risk dominance confliicts with payoff dominance, differences in incentives to optimize help explain results.},
keywords = {coordination,experiments,ritual,stag hunt,theory}
}
@article{battigalliDynamicPsychologicalGames2005,
ids = {Battigalli2005,Battigalli2005a},
title = {Dynamic {{Psychological Games}}},
author = {Battigalli, P and Dufwenberg, M},
year = {2005},
journal = {Journal of Economic Theory},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found,behavioral,lof,psychological games,theory}
}
@article{battigalliGuiltGames2007,
ids = {Battigalli2007,Battigalli2007a},
title = {Guilt in Games},
author = {Battigalli, P and Dufwenberg, M},
year = {2007},
journal = {American Economic Review},
volume = {97},
number = {2},
pages = {170--176},
publisher = {{American Economic Association Publications}},
doi = {10.1257/aer.97.2.170}
}
@article{bauerCanWarFoster2016,
ids = {bauer2016can},
title = {Can War Foster Cooperation?},
author = {Bauer, Michal and Blattman, Christopher and Chytilov{\'a}, Julie and Henrich, Joseph and Miguel, Edward and Mitts, Tamar},
year = {2016},
journal = {Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume = {30},
number = {3},
pages = {249--274},
doi = {10.1257/jep.30.3.249}
}
@article{baumEffectsRaceEthnicity2007,
ids = {Baum2007,Baum2007a},
title = {The Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Age on Obesity},
author = {Baum, C L},
year = {2007},
journal = {Journal of Population Economics},
volume = {20},
number = {3},
pages = {687--705},
publisher = {{Springer}},
doi = {10.1007/s00148-006-0106-7},
abstract = {@articlecourtemanche:rct, title=Rising Cigarette Taxes and Rising Obesity: Coincidence or Unintended Consequence?, author=Courtemanche, C. and Draft, P. About 30\% of Americans are obese, which is roughly a 100\% increase from 25 years ago. This study examines the effects of changes in the racial/ethnic composition and age distribution on the prevalence of obesity, identifies the portion of the increase in obesity caused by these changes, and projects the effects of future racial/ethnic and age changes on obesity using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Results indicate that racial/ethnic composition changes and age distribution changes have accounted for about 10\% of the increase in obesity over the last 25 years. However, future racial/ethnic and age changes are not projected to increase obesity substantially.},
keywords = {empirical,obesity}
}
@article{baxterSecretTests1984,
ids = {Baxter1984,Baxter1984a},
title = {Secret Tests},
author = {Baxter, L A and Wilmot, W W},
year = {1984},
journal = {Human Communication Research},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
pages = {171--201},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}},
doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00044.x}
}
@article{beberShortsellingBansWorld2013,
ids = {beber2013short},
title = {Short-Selling Bans around the World: Evidence from the 2007\textendash 09 Crisis},
author = {Beber, Alessandro and Pagano, Marco},
year = {2013},
journal = {The Journal of Finance},
volume = {68},
number = {1},
pages = {343--381},
publisher = {{Wiley Online Library}},
doi = {10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01802.x}
}
@article{becchettiCoffeeBookAnatomy1999,
title = {The {{Coffee Book}}: Anatomy of an {{Industry}} from {{Crop}} to the {{Last Drop}}},
author = {Becchetti, L and Solferino, N and Dicum, G and Luttinger, N},
year = {1999},
journal = {AICCON-Universit\`a\vphantom\{\} di Bologna Working Paper, keywords = behavioral,ft,habit,pricing, number = q, title = The dynamics of ethical product differentiation and the habit formation of socially responsible consumers, year = 2004},
abstract = {In our model of ethical product differentiation two duopolists (a zero profit socially concerned producer and a profit maximizing producer) compete over prices and (costly) ``socially and environmentally responsible'' features of their products under a given law of motion of consumer' habits. In a continuous time model in which the location of the zero profit social responsible entrant is fixed and the profit maximizing producer (PMP) limits himself to price competition without ethical imitation, we show that the optimal dynamic PMP's price is always lower than his optimal static price since the PMP producer knows that, by leaving too much market share to the other producer, he will reinforce the habit of socially responsible consumption and loose further market share in the future. We inspect the properties of equilibria when the PMP can ethically imitate the entrant and when the entrant is free to choose his location. We find that, in the first case, the threshold triggering a PMP strategy of ethical imitation and minimum price differentiation is lower in the dynamic than in the static case, depending on the PMP's shadow cost of changes in consumers social responsibility.},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
note = {ft, coffee, agriculture}
}
@article{becchettiDynamicsFairTrade,
ids = {BECCHETTI,BECCHETTIa},
title = {The Dynamics of {{Fair Trade}} as a Mixed-Form Market},
author = {BECCHETTI, L and HUYBRECHTS, B},
doi = {10.1007/s10551-007-9544-8},
abstract = {This article analyzes the Fair Trade sector as a ``mixed-form market'', i.e. a market in which different types of players (in this case, nonprofit, co-operative and for-profit organizations) coexist and compete. The purposes of this article are (1) to understand the factors that have led Fair Trade to become a mixed-form market and (2) to propose some trails to understand the market dynamics that result from the interactions between the different types of players. We start by defining briefly Fair Trade, its different dimensions (including the ``fair'' quality of the products) and its organizational landscape, focusing on the distinction between the pioneer ``Alternative Trading Organizations'' and the second-mover companies. Then, we recall the theoretical emergence factors for each type of organization (nonprofit, co-operative and for- profit) and apply these emergence factors to the context of Fair Trade. This analysis allows us to capture the specificities of each type of operator with regard to Fair Trade and, thus, to have a better understanding of the competition dynamics in the sector. The latter analysis includes elements on ethical imitation, consumers' behaviors, effects on welfare and the role of the government, in order to outline some of the major trends in this rapidly evolving secto},
keywords = {FT,Industrial Organization,theory}
}
@article{becchettiEthicalProductDifferentiation2003,
ids = {Becchetti2003,Becchetti2003a},
title = {On Ethical Product Differentiation},
author = {Becchetti, L and Solferino, N},
year = {2003},
publisher = {{CEIS Working Paper}},
abstract = {In our model of ethical product differentiation two duopolists compete over prices and (costly) \^A``socially and environmentally responsible\^A'' features of their products. We show that the incumbent finds it optimal to reduce the price after the ethical producer's entry when his (non ethical) location is fixed. His optimal price is halfway between his zero profit price and the zero profit price of the ethical producer. By removing the fixed location hypothesis we find that the ethical producer\^A's entry has positive indirect effects on aggregate social and environmental responsibility since the incumbent finds it optimal to imitate him when consumers\^A' perception of ethical costs is sufficiently high. In the paper we also show that the solution of the three-stage game - in which location and prices are simultaneously chosen and the profit maximising producer is Stackelberg leader in location \^A\textendash{} has three main features: minimum price differentiation, ethical imitation and non minimal ethical differentiation. We explain the differences between these findings and those from a traditional Hotelling game as depending from three main features: i) the different goals of the two (profit maximising and zero profit) competitors; ii) the asymmetry in costs of "ethical" distance and iii) the lack of independence between ethical location and prices.},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found,entry,ft,FT,hotelling,Industrial Organization}
}
@article{beckerHumanCapitalTheoretical1964,
ids = {Becker1964,Becker1964a},
title = {Human {{Capital}}: A {{Theoretical}} and {{Empirical Analysis}}, with {{Special Reference}} to {{Education}}, by {{Gary S}}},
author = {Becker, Gary Stanley},
year = {1964},
journal = {Becker},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found,nleduc}
}
@article{beckerNobelLectureEconomic1993,
ids = {Becker1993,Becker1993a},
title = {Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior},
author = {Becker, Gary S},
year = {1993},
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
pages = {385--409},
publisher = {{JSTOR}},
doi = {10.1086/261880}
}
@article{beckerTheoryMarriagePart1973,
ids = {Becker1973,Becker1973a},
title = {A {{Theory}} of {{Marriage}}: Part {{I}}},
author = {Becker, G S},
year = {1973},
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
volume = {81},
number = {4},
pages = {813},
publisher = {{The University of Chicago Press}},
doi = {10.1086/260084},
keywords = {family,lof,marriage,matching models,theory}
}
@article{beckerTheoryMarriagePart1974,
ids = {Becker1974a,Becker1974c},
title = {A {{Theory}} of {{Marriage}}: Part {{II}}},
author = {Becker, G S},
year = {1974},
publisher = {{NBER}},
doi = {10.1086/260287},
keywords = {family,lof,marriage,matching models,theory}
}
@article{beckerTheorySocialInteractions1974,
ids = {Becker1974,Becker1974b},
title = {A {{Theory}} of {{Social Interactions}}},
author = {Becker, Gary S},
year = {1974},
month = nov,
journal = {The Journal of Political Economy},
volume = {82},
number = {6},
pages = {1063--1093},
publisher = {{The University of Chicago Press}},
issn = {0022-3808},
doi = {10.1086/260265},
keywords = {altruism,theory}
}
@article{bekkersGenerosityPhilanthropyLiterature2008,
ids = {Bekkers2008,Bekkers2008a},
title = {Generosity and {{Philanthropy}}: A {{Literature Review}}},
author = {Bekkers, R and Wiepking, P},
year = {2008},
journal = {Working paper.},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found,experimental,interdisciplinary,literature review,philanthropy,survey data}
}
@inproceedings{bekkersItNotAll2005,
ids = {Bekkers2005,Bekkers2005a},
title = {It's {{Not All}} in the {{Ask}}. {{Effects}} and {{Effectiveness}} of {{Recruitment Strategies Used}} by {{Nonprofits}} in {{The Netherlands}}},
booktitle = {34rd {{Annual ARNOVA}}-{{Conference}}},
author = {Bekkers, R},
year = {2005},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found}
}
@article{bekkersWhenWhyMatches2005,
ids = {Bekkers2005b},
title = {When and {{Why Matches}} Are {{More Effective Subsidies Than Rebates}}},
author = {Bekkers, Ren{\'e}},
year = {2005},
pages = {1--21}
}
@article{belloniProgramEvaluationCausal2013,
ids = {Belloni2013},
title = {Program {{Evaluation}} and {{Causal Inference}} with {{High}}-{{Dimensional Data}}},
author = {Belloni, Alexandre and Chernozhukov, Victor and {Fern{\'a}ndez-Val}, Ivan and Hansen, Christian},
year = {2013},
month = nov,
eprint = {1311.2645},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
abstract = {In this paper, we provide efficient estimators and honest confidence bands for a variety of treatment effects including local average (LATE) and local quantile treatment effects (LQTE) in data-rich environments. We can handle very many control variables, endogenous receipt of treatment, heterogeneous treatment effects, and function-valued outcomes. Our framework covers the special case of exogenous receipt of treatment, either conditional on controls or unconditionally as in randomized control trials. In the latter case, our approach produces efficient estimators and honest bands for (functional) average treatment effects (ATE) and quantile treatment effects (QTE). To make informative inference possible, we assume that key reduced form predictive relationships are approximately sparse. This assumption allows the use of regularization and selection methods to estimate those relations, and we provide methods for post-regularization and post-selection inference that are uniformly valid (honest) across a wide-range of models. We show that a key ingredient enabling honest inference is the use of orthogonal or doubly robust moment conditions in estimating certain reduced form functional parameters. We illustrate the use of the proposed methods with an application to estimating the effect of 401(k) eligibility and participation on accumulated assets.},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
arxivid = {1311.2645},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found}
}
@article{bergstromPrivateProvisionPublic1986,
ids = {Bergstrom1986,Bergstrom1986a},
title = {On the Private Provision of Public Goods},
author = {Bergstrom, T and Blume, L and Varian, H},
year = {1986},
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
volume = {29},
number = {1},
pages = {25--49},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
doi = {10.1016/0047-2727(86)90024-1},
keywords = {philanthropy,public goods,Public goods,theory}
}
@techreport{beshearsEffectProvidingPeer2011,
ids = {Beshears2011a,Beshears2011d},
title = {The Effect of Providing Peer Information on Retirement Savings Decisions},
author = {Beshears, John and Choi, James J and Laibson, David and Madrian, Brigitte C and Milkman, Katherine L},
year = {2011},
institution = {{National Bureau of Economic Research}},
abstract = {We conducted a field experiment in a 401(k) plan to measure the effect of disseminating information about peer behavior on savings. Low-saving employees received simplified plan enrollment or contribution increase forms. A randomized subset of forms stated the fraction of age-matched coworkers participating in the plan or age-matched participants contributing at least 6\% of pay to the plan. We document an oppositional reaction: the presence of peer information decreased the savings of non-participants who were ineligible for 401(k) automatic enrollment, and higher observed peer savings rates also decreased savings. Discouragement from upward social comparisons seems to drive this reaction.},
keywords = {retirement consulting}
}
@article{bhalotraFertilityResponsesInfant,
ids = {Bhalotra,Bhalotraa},
title = {Fertility {{Responses}} to {{Infant}} and {{Maternal Mortality}}: Quasi-{{Experimental Evidence}} from 20th {{Century America}}},
author = {Bhalotra, Sonia R and Hollywood, David and Venkataramani, Atheendar},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found}
}
@article{bichlerCoreselectingCombinatorialClock2013,
ids = {Bichler2013,Bichler2013a},
title = {Do Core-Selecting {{Combinatorial Clock Auctions}} Always Lead to High Efficiency? An Experimental Analysis of Spectrum Auction Designs},
author = {Bichler, Martin and Shabalin, Pasha and Wolf, Jurgen},
year = {2013},
journal = {Experimental Economics},
volume = {16},
number = {4},
pages = {511--545},
publisher = {{Springer}},
doi = {10.1007/s10683-013-9350-3}
}
@article{biddleSleepAllocationTime1990,
ids = {Biddle1990,Biddle1990a},
title = {Sleep and the {{Allocation}} of {{Time}}},
author = {Biddle, Jeff E and Hamermesh, Daniel S},
year = {1990},
month = oct,
journal = {The Journal of Political Economy},
volume = {98},
number = {5},
pages = {922--943},
publisher = {{The University of Chicago Press}},
issn = {0022-3808},
doi = {10.1086/261713},
abstract = {Using aggregated data for 12 countries, a cross section of microeconomic data, and a panel of households, we demonstrate that increases in time in the labor market reduce sleep. Our theory of the demand for sleep differs from standard models of time use by assuming that sleep affects wages by affecting labor market productivity. Estimates of a system of demand equations demonstrate that higher wage rates reduce sleep time among men but increase their waking nonmarket time by an equal amount. Among women the wage effect on sleep is negative but very small.},
keywords = {[philanthropy],substitution,survey,time}
}
@article{bijmoltMetaAnalysisMarketingWhen2001,
title = {Meta-{{Analysis}} in {{Marketing}} When {{Studies Contain Multiple Measurements}}},
author = {Bijmolt, Tammo H A and Pieters, Rik G M},
year = {2001},
journal = {Marketing Letters},
volume = {12},
number = {2},
pages = {157--169},
issn = {09230645},
doi = {10.1023/A:1011117103381},
abstract = {Most meta-analyses in marketing contain studies which themselves contain multiple measurements of the focal effect. This paper compares alternative procedures to deal with multiple measurements through the analysis of synthetic data sets in a Monte Carlo Study and a re-analysis of a published marketing data set. We show that the choice of procedure to deal with multiple measurements is by no means trivial and that it has implications for the results and for the validity of the generalizations derived from meta-analyses. Procedures that use the complete set of measurements outperform procedures that represent each study by a single value, The commonly used method of treating all measurements as independent performs reasonably well but is not preferable. We show that the optimal procedure to account for multiple measurements in meta-analysis explicitly deals with the nested error structure, i.e., at the measurement level and at the study level, which has not been practiced before in marketing meta-analyses.},
keywords = {Generalizations,meta-analysis,Monte Carlo simulation,Multiple measurements}
}
@article{bilodeauRivalCharities1997,
ids = {Bilodeau1997,Bilodeau1997a},
title = {Rival Charities},
author = {Bilodeau, M and Slivinski, A},
year = {1997},
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
volume = {66},
number = {3},
pages = {449--467},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
doi = {10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00046-7},
keywords = {Industrial Organization,nonprofits,philanthropy}
}
@article{binmoreAmbiguityGameTheory,
ids = {Binmoreb},
title = {Ambiguity in {{Game Theory}} ?},