You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the most common pieces of feedback I get from clients for visualizations that use the SI format is "What does G mean?" and "Why doesn't is use B for Billions?".
However, as I find myself doing this over and over in different projects, I wonder if it might be a sensible thing to build into d3-format. I thought I'd open this issue as a place to discuss ways to approach this.
Changing this wouldn’t be backwards-compatible, and also muddies the feature definition, which is very clearly defined to used SI prefixes. The way for this feature to proceed is a new format directive (something other than s), which is covered by #71. So I’m closing this as a duplicate, but I’d welcome input on that issue!
One of the most common pieces of feedback I get from clients for visualizations that use the SI format is "What does G mean?" and "Why doesn't is use B for Billions?".
It's easy enough to do string replacement with something like this:
However, as I find myself doing this over and over in different projects, I wonder if it might be a sensible thing to build into
d3-format
. I thought I'd open this issue as a place to discuss ways to approach this.Anyone else run into this issue?
Related: #71
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: