You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 3, 2021. It is now read-only.
Hi
in my team, we are currenting evaluating reusing an existing codebase which was developed using D2RQ for DBMS mapping, updating the language to R2RML.
We'd like to use the new version of D2RQ, but I'm a bit confused about the current state of the various forks? is this project the current state of the art, do we have to skip the develop branch from D2RQ?
For example I've done some testing using the version d2rq-r2rml-preview-v4 and as far as I understand, the release seems to be a merge between this project and the traditional D2RQ code: I tried the server but it gives me an error which seems to be actually logged in this project, so I suppose the final distribution is a sort of merge between the two. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
thanks in advance for any suggestion and clarification
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi
in my team, we are currenting evaluating reusing an existing codebase which was developed using D2RQ for DBMS mapping, updating the language to R2RML.
We'd like to use the new version of D2RQ, but I'm a bit confused about the current state of the various forks? is this project the current state of the art, do we have to skip the
develop
branch from D2RQ?For example I've done some testing using the version d2rq-r2rml-preview-v4 and as far as I understand, the release seems to be a merge between this project and the traditional D2RQ code: I tried the server but it gives me an error which seems to be actually logged in this project, so I suppose the final distribution is a sort of merge between the two. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
thanks in advance for any suggestion and clarification
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: