You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
Reference to #13432 - I create a discussion
Summary
Disable increment account sequence number value for feepayer account
Problem Definition
Cosmos SDK allows to set feepayer param for all transactions thanks to this - transaction fee is charged from another account (fee payer). These transactions must also be signed by feepayer account. We want to create a service that will be signer all transactions and pay fees instead of our user. But for sign transactions, we need to use a sequence of fee payer accounts - which today increment automatically for each transaction. This means that we can only sign 1 transaction per block.
For me - disabling of increment account sequence number value for feepayer accounts will not reduce safety.
What do you think about it? Maybe someone sees security issues?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
Reference to #13432 - I create a discussion
Summary
Disable increment account sequence number value for feepayer account
Problem Definition
Cosmos SDK allows to set feepayer param for all transactions thanks to this - transaction fee is charged from another account (fee payer). These transactions must also be signed by feepayer account. We want to create a service that will be signer all transactions and pay fees instead of our user. But for sign transactions, we need to use a sequence of fee payer accounts - which today increment automatically for each transaction. This means that we can only sign 1 transaction per block.
For me - disabling of increment account sequence number value for feepayer accounts will not reduce safety.
What do you think about it? Maybe someone sees security issues?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions