Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Needless reference into 9165 #44

Open
chrysn opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Needless reference into 9165 #44

chrysn opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@chrysn
Copy link
Member

chrysn commented Jul 27, 2022

The document references RFC9165 (cddl-control, as cddlplus), but I found none of the new controls used.

If really nothing of 9165 is used (maybe I missed something), I suggest that the reference be removed.
@cabo
Copy link
Member

cabo commented Jul 27, 2022

The IANA Considerations have a column "CDDL type". This should be able to use all of CDDL.

Of course, RFC 9090 has registered control operators, and others will, so singling out RFC 9165 is maybe not needed.
I still find it useful as a reminder that CDDL is no longer just RFC 8610.

If we don't want to have that reminder, we can fix it in AUTH48.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cabo @chrysn