Adapt to Coq PR #17084: maximal implicit arguments now added to references in defined Ltac code #30
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ences in defined Ltac code.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In anticipation of a uniformisation in coq/coq#17084 of how references with maximal implicit arguments are interpreted in Ltac code (*), this PR fixes the tactic
has_varinAutosubst_Derive.vso that whenNoneis returned, it returns it with its implicit argument rather than without.This is a priori backwards compatible, so it can be merged as soon as now.
(*) Prior to coq/coq#17084, maximal implicit arguments are inserted in interactive mode but not in non-interactive mode.