-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
advanced search #563
Comments
@cranhandler can we have a reprioritization given that this image assumed these things were the starting line, but they're actually not done yet?:
I'll add difficulties to your existing features:
If you're reading this by email, be sure to click through, I'm sure I'll update it after markdown surprises me with its rendering of these nested lists. |
I think we are good to push when we have item 1 (search by choreographer)
complete
I'd like to prioritize verified&unverified; verified by me, and broken as
the next most important.
none/single/double progression looks like a quick easy it too, and lets us
add that element to the sidebar.
Is this enough to march with?
…On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 4:26 PM Dave Morse ***@***.***> wrote:
@cranhandler <https://github.com/cranhandler> can we have a
reprioritization given that this image assumed these things were the
starting line, but they're actually not done yet?:
1. search by choreographer, title, and in a separate blank, search by
hook (difficulty 2)
2. old search tree functionality (difficulty 16)
I'll add difficulties to your existing features:
1. *formation* check boxes (difficulty 2 for the top 3, I'd need to
see a wireframe for the expanded one...)
2. *progression*
- none/single/double: (difficulty 2)
- progress & unprogress (need more clarity)
- progress figure (difficulty 4)
1. *verified*
- verified-by-me (difficulty 4)
- verified & unverified (difficulty 4)
- broken (needs a way to tag as broken)
If you're reading this by email, be sure to click through, I'm sure I'll
update it after markdown surprises me with its rendering of these nested
lists.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#563?email_source=notifications&email_token=AD3OHTLE7D3F2UB4F3HHMXDQ3EPYFA5CNFSM4G5RLL4KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHZJVLI#issuecomment-569547437>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3OHTOUQK45UOJBHKOV2RLQ3EPYFANCNFSM4G5RLL4A>
.
--
Allison Jonjak, M.S., E.I.T.
[email protected]
allisonjonjak.com
|
react choreographer filter, part of #563
Yes and it's perfect.
…On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:23 AM Dave Morse ***@***.***> wrote:
What would you think of this addition, right below 'verified'?
[image: privacy]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10550086/73748273-aae5cf80-471e-11ea-9ed6-337e63762862.jpg>
* fancy not-logged-in behavior as under discussion in #618
** as above and it searches anything by that user, public, private, or sketchbook
*** only displayed to admins, and checked by default to admins
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#563?email_source=notifications&email_token=AD3OHTPEDRTSEJTOWH4N4W3RBFT5BA5CNFSM4G5RLL4KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEKXTHUQ#issuecomment-581907410>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3OHTNP3BTJ3TWYKSXEFKTRBFT5BANCNFSM4G5RLL4A>
.
|
I want to add more filters to the left side here! I want to add so many that we'll run out of vertical screen space unless some way is found to reign them in. Piece count! Username! Number of gendered moves! This-or-that tag! |
Marking as blocked until there's clarity on how to proceed. In particular, need a decision on which advanced search functionality to build, and a detailed mock on tabs. These are both already cards in Needs Refinement of Core. |
Here's the mockup:
Things to notice
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: