Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 4, 2023. It is now read-only.

CiviCRM 5.x compatibility? #182

Open
brylie opened this issue Jul 22, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

CiviCRM 5.x compatibility? #182

brylie opened this issue Jul 22, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@brylie
Copy link

brylie commented Jul 22, 2019

Is CiviBooking compatible with the CiviCRM 5.x series?

@brylie
Copy link
Author

brylie commented Aug 3, 2019

An organization I used to work for is in discernment about whether to migrate away from CiviCRM or upgrade to the 5.x series. If this CiviBooking module would be compatible with 5.x, it might give more weight to the decision to stay with Civi.

@jamienovick
Copy link

Hi Brylie,

I'm pretty sure everything is working fine with v5.x

Best

Jamie

@brylie
Copy link
Author

brylie commented Aug 4, 2019

Thanks Jamie. Would someone at Compucorp mind updating the documentation and CiviCRM extensions directory entry to mention the 5.x compatibility?

Screenshot_20190804_084411-1

I think this is important information, as it could lead people to believe this extension is not compatible with 5.x in it's latest released version.

@HeneryH
Copy link

HeneryH commented Nov 15, 2020

I really am not sure it is working. I installed it and keep getting "page not found" responses on my 5.30-dev install. I need to figure out the debugging process. Nothing is being shown in the logs via the log-viewer module.

@wintermoor
Copy link

CiviBooking installs on CiviCRM 5.43 (with WordPress) and shows config and menu etc.
Trying to set ressources or configurations brings an empty Error 500 page. Ergo: Not working out-of-the-box.

see: #191 and #195

@mlutfy
Copy link

mlutfy commented Nov 24, 2021

we have a fork here, 'symbiotic' branch, if anyone wants to test: https://github.com/coopsymbiotic/civibooking/ (it includes patches from various people, either open PRs from this repo, or changes by mattwire)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants