Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Visual Bug] v6.7.0-common has incorrect version string #51

Open
bw908 opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

[Visual Bug] v6.7.0-common has incorrect version string #51

bw908 opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@bw908
Copy link

bw908 commented Oct 7, 2024

There is a minor error/visual bug in the version information displayed in the v6.7 image.

I deployed the v6.7.0-common prebuilt image to an RPi 4. The version information is incorrect; the ostree deployment says it is 6.6.0-devel-20240324182453+build.0-tcbuilder.20241007175223

@drewmoseley
Copy link
Contributor

I was able to confirm this. Interesting. I don't think it's just a visual bug though. It seems to me OSTree would have the right version stamp so I wonder if we have a bug in CI or something that creates the release. @jsrc27 @microhobby can you guys comment?

@microhobby
Copy link
Contributor

@drewmoseley @bw908 this image comes from the Github releases or from https://commontorizon.dev/delegations/tdx-common.json ?

@drewmoseley
Copy link
Contributor

From the github releases installed with:

rpi-imager --repo https://github.com/commontorizon/meta-common-torizon/releases/download/v6.7.0-common/os_list_imagingutility.json

@microhobby
Copy link
Contributor

@drewmoseley so, I think that is really only a visual bug. I also introduced a change to have the versioning bumped by us: 921cd73

Sometimes the upstream had not changed the numbers or was waiting for Toradex BSP, but on our side we had completed the development. This was the case with these builds of v6.7.0 for example.

@microhobby microhobby added the question Further information is requested label Oct 14, 2024
@microhobby microhobby self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
@bw908
Copy link
Author

bw908 commented Oct 15, 2024

Yes, I was using the image downloaded directly from the github releases page when I observed this.

@microhobby microhobby removed their assignment Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants