We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Commit fbb964f added blueish to the usage dictionary. I'm not sure why it ended up there, doesn't seem to have anything to do with terminology RFC draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-terminology/)
blueish
Maybe it should be in dictionary_rare.txt ?
dictionary_rare.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CC @luzpaz
Sorry, something went wrong.
Remove "blueish" correction
5151404
It's not a typo, or a correction that really needs to be made, as both "blueish" and "bluish" are acceptable forms: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/18824/why-are-blueish-and-bluish-both-considered-correct-spellings Closes: codespell-project#3509
1bbb8b6
6b8e7e6
It's not a typo, or a correction that really needs to be made, as both "blueish" and "bluish" are acceptable forms: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/18824/why-are-blueish-and-bluish-both-considered-correct-spellings Closes: codespell-project#3509 Fixes: fbb964f ("Add several spelling corrections")
No branches or pull requests
Commit fbb964f added
blueish
to the usage dictionary. I'm not sure why it ended up there, doesn't seem to have anything to do with terminology RFC draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-terminology/)Maybe it should be in
dictionary_rare.txt
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: