You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
SQL standard defines START TRANSACTION statement to begin new transaction. However most of SQL engines currently support BEGIN TRANSACTION which is what immudb supports.
We would like to keep immudb SQL syntax clean and (similarly to what go language promotes) avoid having multiple ways of doing one thing. In order to support START TRANSACTION statement we would have to have a clear reason to support it - e.g. an ORM framework that uses START TRANSACTION when talking over psql protocol. Please let us know in the discussion if you find such use case.
Should immudb support `START TRANSACTION` as an alternative to `BEGIN TRANSACTION` ?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
SQL standard defines
START TRANSACTION
statement to begin new transaction. However most of SQL engines currently supportBEGIN TRANSACTION
which is what immudb supports.We would like to keep immudb SQL syntax clean and (similarly to what go language promotes) avoid having multiple ways of doing one thing. In order to support
START TRANSACTION
statement we would have to have a clear reason to support it - e.g. an ORM framework that usesSTART TRANSACTION
when talking overpsql
protocol. Please let us know in the discussion if you find such use case.0 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions