]m, ]M method movements

[ghost]

vim provides nice method movements:

						*]m*
]m			Go to [count] next start of a method (for Java or
			similar structured language).  When not before the
			start of a method, jump to the start or end of the
			class.  When no '{' is found after the cursor, this is
			an error.  |exclusive| motion.
						*]M*
]M			Go to [count] next end of a method (for Java or
			similar structured language).  When not before the end
			of a method, jump to the start or end of the class.
			When no '}' is found after the cursor, this is an
			error. |exclusive| motion.
						*[m*
[m			Go to [count] previous start of a method (for Java or
			similar structured language).  When not after the
			start of a method, jump to the start or end of the
			class.  When no '{' is found before the cursor this is
			an error. |exclusive| motion.
						*[M*
[M			Go to [count] previous end of a method (for Java or
			similar structured language).  When not after the
			end of a method, jump to the start or end of the
			class.  When no '}' is found before the cursor this is
			an error. |exclusive| motion.

But they don't work in C#. This SO answer from 2014 shows how OmniSharp can be used to provide expected functionality:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/25521838/3310334

And I guess nowadays, OmniSharp may have taken better steps in supporting this and ensuring correct behaviour.

Does coc-omnisharp have a way to "fix" ]m, [m, etc., movements? (It doesn't override them by default)

How can I set that up if the possibility already exists?